Reality Check by Dave Whamond for September 27, 2012
September 26, 2012
September 28, 2012
Transcript:
During this trial, we intend to prove that this butterfly, negligently flapping his wings, set in motion a chain of events, resulting in a tornado, making him financially respon sible...
chireef about 12 years ago
if it is silly then prove it wrong
Arianne about 12 years ago
Butterfly farms, beware. It’s only a matter of time…
Kvasir42 Premium Member about 12 years ago
Considering all the typhoons we’ve been getting this summer, literally one every two weeks for the last 6 weeks, that butterfly has a lot of ‘splainin’ to do.
rini1946 about 12 years ago
The worst part is that the jury will prove him guilty and the lawyer will get 2 mill in fees and the client will get 100 bucks
William Bednar Premium Member about 12 years ago
This is like blaming the state of the world economy on the price of peanuts in Antartica!
Stephen Gilberg about 12 years ago
Well, a butterfly that size would have a bigger impact than most….
krbuza about 12 years ago
“The Butterfly Effect” is an absurdity of pseudo-science.
However, it is not entirely without merit, but any merit there relates to cumulative effect, not the actions of one butterfly or lack thereof.
Mister-Edd about 12 years ago
Monarch butterflies have been known to break tree branches when they all fly off at once.
MeGoNow Premium Member about 12 years ago
If the butterfly is guilty, the prosecutor is a lot more guilty. His hand flapping moves far more air than the butterfly’s wings. The butterfly is no more significant in a set of initial conditions as a near infinity of random events too numerous and subtle to observe.
ReaderLady about 12 years ago
The juror on the left seems to buy the argument already.