Caulfield says “At least the grasshopper had a life first” which implies that the ant did not. I would argue that Caulfield, in this case, is wrong in a couple of ways: 1. The grasshopper fiddling – maybe temporary (but passing) enjoyment – but not a “life”. 2. The ant stockpiling food – not particularly fun – but accomplishing something (even if/though he didn’t reap the final benefit) – a life. 3. Life is not all about having a good time.
Caulfield says “At least the grasshopper had a life first” which implies that the ant did not. I would argue that Caulfield, in this case, is wrong in a couple of ways: 1. The grasshopper fiddling – maybe temporary (but passing) enjoyment – but not a “life”. 2. The ant stockpiling food – not particularly fun – but accomplishing something (even if/though he didn’t reap the final benefit) – a life. 3. Life is not all about having a good time.