Frazz by Jef Mallett for October 16, 2024

  1. Flash
    pschearer Premium Member 2 months ago

    They just awarded the Nobel award (the Prize is different) to three economists for showing that free economies are the best.

    Well, duh! Like free-market economists haven’t been saying that for about a century and a half.

     •  Reply
  2. Ti
    Rhetorical_Question   2 months ago

    Argumentative kid?

     •  Reply
  3. Hat large square
    Cactus-Pete  2 months ago

    I believe you never have a point. This kid probably belongs in Non-Sequitur since that’s what he’s good at.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Julius Marold Premium Member 2 months ago

    There’s a very good reason why economics is called “the dismal science”.

     •  Reply
  5. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  2 months ago

    It’s confusing because it’s actually psychological… which is hard, so economists make “simplifying assumptions” which are almost always wrong. Or you can just describe inputs and outputs, which is boring (unless you LIKE bookkeeping)

     •  Reply
  6. Swallowed a hockey stick
    Ceeg22 Premium Member 2 months ago

    No, you didn’t. At some point you’ll see why

     •  Reply
  7. Photo
    Charles  2 months ago

    Economics, the dismal “science”.

     •  Reply
  8. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  2 months ago

    Forget it, Caulfield. You’re never gonna simplify the language of titles. They are too important to the egos that wear them.

     •  Reply
  9. Img 0716
    bobtoledo Premium Member 2 months ago

    Nothing takes off like a discussion on Economics. If only it were an actual science we might learn something.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Bruce1253  2 months ago

    That QED for the cognoscenti.

     •  Reply
  11. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member 2 months ago

    If you laid a thousand economists end to end, they would point in all directions.

    But absolutists are the worst: “Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it’s just the opposite.” —John Kenneth Galbraith, American economist

    Interestingly, almost all of the Nobel Prizes in Economics awarded in this century have been for studies showing how the seminal work in the field, Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations (1776) was wrong due to gross over-simplifications. To be charitable, Smith didn’t have access to the massive troves of data and processing capabilities available to modern economists, so his critics are kind of taking unfair advantage. And, despite that, they still can’t agree among themselves.

    For my own part (to over-simplify even more egregiously than Smith ever did), I favor socialism for necessities and capitalism for luxuries.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    Smeagol  2 months ago

    Caulfield’s economy of words is right on!

     •  Reply
  13. Screenshot  47
    tammyspeakslife Premium Member 2 months ago

    Economics is confusing? Try marketing, so much simpler.. not really.

     •  Reply
  14. Image001
    dogday Premium Member 2 months ago

    Oh LORDY! First they don’t understand cursive. Now it’s words of more than one syllable. We are rapidly devolving to the grunt stage.

     •  Reply
  15. Dsc 0101
    Happy Tinkerbelle Premium Member 2 months ago

    You can’t spell economics without comics

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    tvstevie  2 months ago

    Most people would have said, “Whatever.”

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Frazz