When the "justice"s rule on technology they almost always get it wrong. You’d think that they might learn… but I guess they have a special framed version of Dunning-Kruger syndrome… because they’re, you know, Justices of the Supreme Court and all. So they feel that if you just explain it right they’ll understand it fully enough to make a good ruling.
But in this case, I think they ruled how they were paid off to rule, (im)pure and simple, and found a narrow way to make it seem like they actually thought about it.
When the "justice"s rule on technology they almost always get it wrong. You’d think that they might learn… but I guess they have a special framed version of Dunning-Kruger syndrome… because they’re, you know, Justices of the Supreme Court and all. So they feel that if you just explain it right they’ll understand it fully enough to make a good ruling.
But in this case, I think they ruled how they were paid off to rule, (im)pure and simple, and found a narrow way to make it seem like they actually thought about it.