If you accept the notion of “intelligent design”, Nola, then I am not surprised that you were stuck with some swampland.
Let me note that your assertions of three days ago are baseless and without substance or proof. The claim that sex is firstly pleasurable and secondarily for procreation is at least as substantive as your claim for the reverse.
Therefore, let us drop that issue and return to the question I posed to Capulet, which he/she fled from answering. Perhaps you will answer it: Why should an insurance company cover an injury while driving when driving is an enormously risky behavior?
If you accept the notion of “intelligent design”, Nola, then I am not surprised that you were stuck with some swampland.
Let me note that your assertions of three days ago are baseless and without substance or proof. The claim that sex is firstly pleasurable and secondarily for procreation is at least as substantive as your claim for the reverse.
Therefore, let us drop that issue and return to the question I posed to Capulet, which he/she fled from answering. Perhaps you will answer it: Why should an insurance company cover an injury while driving when driving is an enormously risky behavior?