Of course I’ve got to put my 2 cents in whenever there’s an opportunity to stir the pot. There being no way to absolutely prove either side, I pose the following: If the believer is right, after death he or she recieves their reward. If they are wrong, it is meaningless. If the non-believer is right, it is meaningless. If they are wrong, they are screwed. (Gary Larson posed Col. Sanders at the gates of heaven flanked by large chicken statues) I’ll take the believer’s path. It works for me in other ways too but I don’t think you can argue the logic of the above statement. I agree that this is not the best forum for religious discussion but I couldn’t help myself.
Of course I’ve got to put my 2 cents in whenever there’s an opportunity to stir the pot. There being no way to absolutely prove either side, I pose the following: If the believer is right, after death he or she recieves their reward. If they are wrong, it is meaningless. If the non-believer is right, it is meaningless. If they are wrong, they are screwed. (Gary Larson posed Col. Sanders at the gates of heaven flanked by large chicken statues) I’ll take the believer’s path. It works for me in other ways too but I don’t think you can argue the logic of the above statement. I agree that this is not the best forum for religious discussion but I couldn’t help myself.