Clearly Scott Stantis wrote this ’toon weeks ago. Clearly out of date now.
NO! We have NOT seen any evidence that there was “no collusion” or “no obstruction.”
On the contrary, all we have is a four-page summary and a promise to release Barr’s own EDITED version with any damaging material “redacted.”
While some material may not be appropriate for the general public, congressional committees routinely receive highly sensitive material under seal, including national security secrets far more sensitive than anything in the Mueller report. There is NO VALID REASON that this information cannot be provided to congress other than a cover up.
Barr: the report says “no conspiracy” and “no obstruction” but you can’t see the actual report.
Then Mueller’s own staff objects and says that they DID find material unfavorable to the president, but it did not rise to the level of a criminal indictment EITHER because there was collusion and wrongdoing that did not rise to the level of an actual criminal indictment OR because of a DOJ internal rule (not a law, not in the Constitution, just an internal memo) that prohibits an indictment so nothing could rise to such a level given that rule.
The only way we can know is RELEASE THE FULL MUELLER REPORT.
Clearly Scott Stantis wrote this ’toon weeks ago. Clearly out of date now.
NO! We have NOT seen any evidence that there was “no collusion” or “no obstruction.”
On the contrary, all we have is a four-page summary and a promise to release Barr’s own EDITED version with any damaging material “redacted.”
While some material may not be appropriate for the general public, congressional committees routinely receive highly sensitive material under seal, including national security secrets far more sensitive than anything in the Mueller report. There is NO VALID REASON that this information cannot be provided to congress other than a cover up.
Barr: the report says “no conspiracy” and “no obstruction” but you can’t see the actual report.
Then Mueller’s own staff objects and says that they DID find material unfavorable to the president, but it did not rise to the level of a criminal indictment EITHER because there was collusion and wrongdoing that did not rise to the level of an actual criminal indictment OR because of a DOJ internal rule (not a law, not in the Constitution, just an internal memo) that prohibits an indictment so nothing could rise to such a level given that rule.
The only way we can know is RELEASE THE FULL MUELLER REPORT.