The Ohio State theory was that those items were still university property. If so, why were the athletes not charged if they did not turn them back in, so that they were then their personal items, and they were merely regaining what they paid for them?
As for the family shopping the athlete, tell that to SoCal.
Like NA$CAR, make it up as you go along for maximum benefit to the sport.
The Ohio State theory was that those items were still university property. If so, why were the athletes not charged if they did not turn them back in, so that they were then their personal items, and they were merely regaining what they paid for them?
As for the family shopping the athlete, tell that to SoCal.
Like NA$CAR, make it up as you go along for maximum benefit to the sport.