Your “Kalifornistan” is contraindicated in this instance, FishStix. All of the “-stans” have the death penalty in full swing, while it’s the developed, civilized nations which have abandoned state-sanctioned blood revenge.
Fritz you obviously do not live in Kalifornistan or you would connected with Fishstix barb on the late great state of California. We are ruled by Fascist judges who circumvent the will of the people. Along with a liberal legislature who is more concerned about health care for criminals and educating illegal aliens than balancing the budget. I can’t wait for financial collapse to occur so that we can start over from scratch!
worldisacomic, I DO live in California. San Francisco, in fact. No doubt our votes cancel each other out. Life without Parole is cheaper than the Death Penalty, and retains the possibility of the wrongfully-convicted being released. I don’t lose much sleep over the “monsters” who are executed, but the long list of people who’ve been killed by the state(s) who’ve later turned out to be innocent is argument enough to abolish the death penalty. How many innocents are you willing to execute to ensure than no guilty people are spared?
“I’d rather risk killing my friends than allow my enemies to live.” - Saddam Hussein.
I am a fkirm believer in the death penalty, with one caveat it must be beyond any doubt, not just a reasonable doubt. Then execution should be within two months of one mandatory appeal
Great response fritz! appreciate your come back. However, I know of no criminal in California who was executed and found innocent after the fact. My reality of this goes back to Caryl W Chessman to Clarence R Allen, all vicious sadistic animals. And I expect the state to fulfill its legal responsibility and take the life of Albert G Brown of Riverside County. BUT I’m sure a judge will step in and save this piece of krap. I hurt for the victims of these animals. And there are more innocent victims than innocent criminals that were executed.
That’s the beauty of armed, law-abiding citizens. When they shoot the attacker, there is no doubt that they got the guilty person. Also saves on prison, legal expenses and prevents repeat offenders.
What was interesting about Chessman is he never killed anyone or was involved in any killing, but was still executed by California in 1960, due to the interpretation of the “Little Lindburgh” law by the court (and the jury).
Also interesting is worldisacomic’s statement “And there are more innocent victims than innocent criminals that were executed”. Does that mean it’s OK to execute “innocent criminals” as long as we execute fewer innocents than there are victims? This confuses me…
magnamax almost 14 years ago
I mean, really!
magnamax almost 14 years ago
from “The Search for Spock” ” I would hate to get shot on the way to my courts martial”.
quinones.felix almost 14 years ago
The choice is healthy and miserable or satisfied and dead. Mine is death of happiness. We all have to die of something.
GROG Premium Member almost 14 years ago
I probably wouldn’t be very hungry, Fixhstix, if I knew it was my last.
fritzoid Premium Member almost 14 years ago
Your “Kalifornistan” is contraindicated in this instance, FishStix. All of the “-stans” have the death penalty in full swing, while it’s the developed, civilized nations which have abandoned state-sanctioned blood revenge.
Redhead55 almost 14 years ago
Redd Foxx once said - “Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing.”
worldisacomic almost 14 years ago
Fritz you obviously do not live in Kalifornistan or you would connected with Fishstix barb on the late great state of California. We are ruled by Fascist judges who circumvent the will of the people. Along with a liberal legislature who is more concerned about health care for criminals and educating illegal aliens than balancing the budget. I can’t wait for financial collapse to occur so that we can start over from scratch!
fritzoid Premium Member almost 14 years ago
worldisacomic, I DO live in California. San Francisco, in fact. No doubt our votes cancel each other out. Life without Parole is cheaper than the Death Penalty, and retains the possibility of the wrongfully-convicted being released. I don’t lose much sleep over the “monsters” who are executed, but the long list of people who’ve been killed by the state(s) who’ve later turned out to be innocent is argument enough to abolish the death penalty. How many innocents are you willing to execute to ensure than no guilty people are spared?
“I’d rather risk killing my friends than allow my enemies to live.” - Saddam Hussein.
ponytail56 almost 14 years ago
I am a fkirm believer in the death penalty, with one caveat it must be beyond any doubt, not just a reasonable doubt. Then execution should be within two months of one mandatory appeal
worldisacomic almost 14 years ago
Great response fritz! appreciate your come back. However, I know of no criminal in California who was executed and found innocent after the fact. My reality of this goes back to Caryl W Chessman to Clarence R Allen, all vicious sadistic animals. And I expect the state to fulfill its legal responsibility and take the life of Albert G Brown of Riverside County. BUT I’m sure a judge will step in and save this piece of krap. I hurt for the victims of these animals. And there are more innocent victims than innocent criminals that were executed.
Smiley Rmom almost 14 years ago
That’s the beauty of armed, law-abiding citizens. When they shoot the attacker, there is no doubt that they got the guilty person. Also saves on prison, legal expenses and prevents repeat offenders.
Ushindi almost 14 years ago
What was interesting about Chessman is he never killed anyone or was involved in any killing, but was still executed by California in 1960, due to the interpretation of the “Little Lindburgh” law by the court (and the jury).
Also interesting is worldisacomic’s statement “And there are more innocent victims than innocent criminals that were executed”. Does that mean it’s OK to execute “innocent criminals” as long as we execute fewer innocents than there are victims? This confuses me…
Superfrog 5 months ago
Don’t forget to ask for seconds.