It’s odd that satirists can nail the Peanuts gang, and get their personalities and affect just right, while the work-for-hire hacks brought in with the blessing of Schulz’s money-hungry heirs have even less of a clue than (sad to say) Al Plastino and John Stanley, to name two notable examples.
It’s odd that satirists can nail the Peanuts gang, and get their personalities and affect just right, while the work-for-hire hacks brought in with the blessing of Schulz’s money-hungry heirs have even less of a clue than (sad to say) Al Plastino and John Stanley, to name two notable examples.