Amanda the Great by Amanda El-Dweek for September 27, 2023

  1. 8ball circle
    Jonathan Lemon creator about 1 year ago

    Watford people are bigger than life.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    seanfear  about 1 year ago

    story of my life – I think one day I’m going out naked

     •  Reply
  3. Ubik
    Pharmakeus Ubik  about 1 year ago

    I can’t help wondering about the I ♥ Gerald Ford shirt.

     •  Reply
  4. Avatar 2013
    samuli creator about 1 year ago

    Grand Forks or Great Falls?

     •  Reply
  5. Tigresstree  copy enh1
    Tigressy  about 1 year ago

    Big bosoms.

     •  Reply
  6. 15895060 10210098664920743 6308867394258774617 n
    pat sandy creator about 1 year ago

    it’s a clothes call.

     •  Reply
  7. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  about 1 year ago

    My same sentiment! Can’t win! Ive donated so many clothes to the women’s shelter

     •  Reply
  8. Milky way rocks
    wrytercat  about 1 year ago

    Certainly not for short people, and if your bust, waist, hip measurement do not align perfectly – you are forever between sizes.

     •  Reply
  9. Colt2
    coltish1  about 1 year ago

    I think Mandy’s taking over the angermemnon’s function today.

     •  Reply
  10. Chicken and knight
    ericlscott creator about 1 year ago

    Ha! Mandy’s great!

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    CSun Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Opposite here, short torso woman here, it always gathers up (sigh)

     •  Reply
  12. Fdr avatar 6d9910b68a3c 128
    Teto85 Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Exactly. Ex-wife was 4’11" and about 90 lbs soaking wet. Her size would vary depending on the manufacturer. Second wife is 5’11" and willowy at 128 lbs. She faces the same lack of consistency in sizes of clothing depending on manufacturer. Men have it much easier with most clothing dimensions listed. Levi’s or other trousers listed with waist and inseam, dress shirts with neck and sleeve if a long sleeve.

     •  Reply
  13. Cat lying on back t2
    BJIllistrated Premium Member about 1 year ago

    This is yet another travesty brought on by the clothing industry. They’re just messing with us so we have to go back and buy more of whatever it was that didn’t fit. I for one can find a piece of clothing that does fit, and wear it until it falls off my body…of course never two days in a row though.

     •  Reply
  14. Kirby close up with poppies behind   close cropped
    mistercatworks  about 1 year ago

    We are going through my mother’s estate. One of my sisters-in-law found hundreds of dollars of designer clothing, which never even had the sales tags removed. Mom officially became a hoarder when she had an outbuilding constructed at the ranch to expand her hoard storage.

     •  Reply
  15. Screen shot 2022 12 09 at 3.05.53 pm
    davewhamond creator about 1 year ago

    But it looked so good on that short mannequin!

     •  Reply
  16. Dscf3970  2
    crazeekatlady  about 1 year ago

    I have a similar problem. Really long legs and normal all the rest of the height. Try and find women’s slacks with a narrow hip and 36" inseam. They consider 30-32" max for tall. Unhemmed. I will not wear flood pants. Wouldn’t do it as a teen in the 70s and refuse to still.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    R.U. Kidding  about 1 year ago

    Why does he do it? BECAUSE THAT’S HIS JOB!

     •  Reply
  18. Screenshot  47
    tammyspeakslife Premium Member about 1 year ago

    I know. I can’t wear most clothes that are made with elastic in them. They literally hurt, especially the rugby pants that were popular in the 80’s

     •  Reply
  19. Screenshot  47
    tammyspeakslife Premium Member about 1 year ago

    If you ask for a gift receipt you can wait a bit longer to return the item.

     •  Reply
  20. Froggy with cat ears
    willie_mctell  about 1 year ago

    It’s really strange how men’s clothing comes in numerical sizes that relate directly to body measurements and women’s clothing comes in sizes where even the numerical ones vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. Then there’s the general evolution in numbered sizes. In 1963 when I started working in my dad’s dime store I quickly learned that the clothing size for the mannequins was 12. Today the same mannequins would be something between 2 and 6.

     •  Reply
  21. Mel and linda 013
    Melki Premium Member about 1 year ago

    I want women’s pajama pants with pockets, but apparently THAT’S too much to ask!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Amanda the Great