Wizard of Id by Parker and Hart for April 17, 2014

  1. Scrat
    hometownk Premium Member over 10 years ago

    True. But try Russian.

     •  Reply
  2. 20071112 einstein
    hariseldon59  over 10 years ago

    Is Rodney reading the speech balloon? He wouldn’t be able to tell you’re from your based on pronunciation.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    tsandl  over 10 years ago

    Sorry, youruc language.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Burnside217  over 10 years ago

    I tried to tell my teachers the same thing.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Benhamean  over 10 years ago

    Many things in English are illogical, but the your/you’re distinction is very clear if you think about it for half a second.

     •  Reply
  6. 20071112 einstein
    hariseldon59  over 10 years ago

    Hardly. I’m 55 and have been reading comics since childhood.

     •  Reply
  7. 250
    ladykat  over 10 years ago

    I will put any eccentricity of the English language up against some French verb conjugations any day of the week. Any francophones out there remember the tense known as “plus-que-parfait du subjonctif”?

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    bbwoof  over 10 years ago

    your= yore you’re = yure or yoore. way different when spoken.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    EtzEchad  over 10 years ago

    This joke was used in B. C. a few weeks ago. Is Hart getting senile?

     •  Reply
  10. Img 20240924 104124950 2
    David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace  over 10 years ago

    Language isn’t designed to be logicalit ain’t designed allIt’s just the outgrowth of attempts to communicateLet the words land where they fall

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    tuslog64  over 10 years ago

    She too had to try on two tutus.Pour salve on the poor pore.You’re wanting your merchandise now?They’re over there by their baggage.You’re sure your ewe is over by the yew bush?

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    Argy.Bargy2  over 10 years ago

    -ones who complain that English is illogical are those too lazy to learn it-Are you including those of us who are native born and those of us who teach it in that statement? Lots of us realize that English lacks logic, and the reason is that some of it consists of words brought in from other languages that follow their own ‘logic’. -A lot of words from German are now part of English and their spelling, possessive forms and so on might follow the rules of their language of origin.

     •  Reply
  13. Bassethound abernathy
    boldyuma  over 10 years ago

    Yes..It’s not just pronouncing English, it’s use of English..Why do we “drive” on a Parkway,and, “Park” in a driveway?Or, why do we call them “buildings” when they’re already finished building them? Shouldn’t we call them “builts?”

     •  Reply
  14. Spooky
    unca jim  over 10 years ago

    A junior HS English class ‘composition’ required something like a thousand words back in 1951, and the best I could come up with was a story that I modeled after the Mark Twain style of ‘telling’.. Got me the embarrassment of reading it in fronta the class, and an attempt of a beating by members of the football team, “because I waz too dam smart for my britches” (somewhat similar the problem young blacks face from their dumb-ass peers of today) but one doesn’t make LtCol by working at mill-jobs in a small town and dying early of the chemicals and work-dangers of the same. A small win for me, but not really heart-felt.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    potrerokid  over 10 years ago

    I’ve heard that Hungarian & Finnish are also agglutinative languages!

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    Lamberger  over 10 years ago

    One of the problems is that English spelling usually indicates the origin of the word instead of its sound. Which means that a great deal of its spelling is based on the declensions of the source language. From Latin, for example, you have some suffix endings for which the 1st vowel is commonly pronounced by the schwa: able, -eble, -ible; -ant, -ent, -int; -ance, -ence, -ince; -ate; -ete, -ite - et cetera…, et cetera…, et cetera.

    Added to this is the tendency of English to have not changed spelling for the last 500 years, even though it had a huge pronunciation shift. The “ough” of though, through, cough, rough, plough, ought, and borough used to sound the same, but now they sound like the ‘o’ in go, the “oo” in too, the “off” in cough, the “uff” in suffer, the “ow” in flower, the “aw” in saw, and the ‘a’ in above, respectively.

    “What manner of beast hath made such a nest?”, indeed!

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Lamberger  over 10 years ago

    If you’re an English speaker, try this sentence, “A rough-coated, dough-faced, thoughtful ploughman strode through the streets of Scarborough; after falling into a slough, he coughed and hiccoughed.”

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    Jason Scarborough  over 10 years ago

    Didn’t BC just do this bit?

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    wmcb  over 10 years ago

    “”http://appliedabstractions.com/2010/02/04/english-is-tough-stuff/“>English is Tough stuff” (by Gerard Nolst Trenité).

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    phm92190  over 10 years ago

    the difference between your and you’re should be as obvious as the difference between his and he’s

     •  Reply
  21. 1d3fbef1 7cf8 471e b31a 25de085f1923
    Phil (full phname Philip Philop)  over 7 years ago

    B.C. did exactly the same joke.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Wizard of Id