Interesting that they include “firearm possession” with abuse, dog fighting and theft. There is nothing illegal or immoral about “possessing” a firearm. Using it on another human, yes. Possessing it, no.
Though it may have been inadvertent on the part of the bros. Mastroianni (and I hope it was), the attitude that merely possessing a firearm, in itself, automatically makes a person suspect is unfortunately common, at least among the hoplophobic. Would that someday, hopefully in a not-too-distant future, gun ownership will be regarded as commonplace, rather than a cause for irrational paranoia.
stlmaddog5 about 10 years ago
Sad that it’s true.
Observer fo Irony about 10 years ago
Sounds like the sport caster need to hire lawyers as talking heads to explain the penalties instead of referees.
Starman1948 about 10 years ago
Good morning DOCK fans. Good comments all.
JanLC about 10 years ago
Interesting that they include “firearm possession” with abuse, dog fighting and theft. There is nothing illegal or immoral about “possessing” a firearm. Using it on another human, yes. Possessing it, no.
Observer fo Irony about 10 years ago
@JanCinLVHere in Michigan it would have been included if it was found during a felony or that the person did not have a concealed carry permit.
pierreandnicole about 10 years ago
Daily occurrence nowadays. Shame. Anyone who would harm an animal deserves severe punishment.
The Rolling Cat almost 10 years ago
Though it may have been inadvertent on the part of the bros. Mastroianni (and I hope it was), the attitude that merely possessing a firearm, in itself, automatically makes a person suspect is unfortunately common, at least among the hoplophobic. Would that someday, hopefully in a not-too-distant future, gun ownership will be regarded as commonplace, rather than a cause for irrational paranoia.