Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson for September 13, 2015
Transcript:
Calvin: "The big, stupid ultrasaur takes a long drink..." Calvin: "A VERY long drink!" Calvin: "The ferocious allosaur is thirsty too! This means confrontation! Calvin: "Ah heh heh..." Clavin: "Fortunately, this allosaur is the patient type" Moe: "Don't make me smack you across the hall, twerp"
BE THIS GUY over 9 years ago
Allosauruses might still be around if they were as smart as Calvin.
Susie Derkins :D over 9 years ago
Whales aren’t the patient type though.
Renatus Profuturus Frigeridus Premium Member over 9 years ago
Did Allosaures run fast?
phylum over 9 years ago
do i detect a little ultrsaurism going on here..?
Liverlips McCracken Premium Member over 9 years ago
Calvin: Given your relative positions, one well-placed kick and Moe will be singing soprano in the Vienna Boy’s Choir for the rest of his youth/life. You won’t need to run because he’ll be either unconscious or writhing helplessly on the floor. Either way, your troubles with this troglodyte will be over. Go for it!!
Olddog1 over 9 years ago
LeadingEdge. I second djc928’s comments above. In addition, Nab has stated his belief that the scientific method in unsupported circular reasoning and religion is supported by rational investigation. Sometimes I suspect he is baiting normal people.
mikel52 over 9 years ago
Don’t mind Nab. He’s off his meds again.
SunflowerGirl100 over 9 years ago
I wonder if Calvin would daydream about dinosaurs if he knew that many of them had feathers since some evolved into birds. So instead of giant reptiles they might have looked like giant chickens!
InuYugiHakusho over 9 years ago
I believe this would be Moe’s last appearance in the comic strip.
Just So So Premium Member over 9 years ago
T. Sue is more than a few bones and a ribcage.
Vonne Anton over 9 years ago
Facts are bones do not tell a lot of things, such as skin pigment (color, patterns, stripes, polka dots), skin composition (hairy, scaly, feathery, plain); fatty areas, etc. Size and muscle structure can be deduced by bone striations, but that is about it. no one really knows. The artwork is generally a guess based on scientific theory, not knowledge.
You all know I believe in the Bible, but do not support Creationist assumptions either, so there is my bias.
For my real comment: Allosaurs replaced Brontosaurs; now Brontosaurs are back as a specific type. Welcome back Bronties!
Habogee over 9 years ago
I call myself a vague diest. Sort of like ID. I could be right, or I could be wrong. There is no way to know. And I really don’t much give a damn either way.
Poollady1 over 9 years ago
Time to look for another drinking fountain, Calvin.
Godfreydaniel over 9 years ago
The real controversy here is that Moe called Calvin “twerp” when he usually called him “twinky”!
neverenoughgold over 9 years ago
One of these days they will uncover the one Altruisticsaurus…
Number Three over 9 years ago
I’ve said this at least 50 times and I’ll continue to say it.
Bill Watterson’s drawings of dinosaurs blow me away!
xxx
HappyDog/ᵀʳʸ ᴮᵒᶻᵒ ⁴ ᵗʰᵉ ᶠᵘⁿ ᵒᶠ ᶦᵗ Premium Member over 9 years ago
“Only 14% accept the science based Evolution like myself. A distinct minority in this country.”
Just curious since you mentioned it – what country is that? We’re all from different places.
Carl R over 9 years ago
This is simply a debate that comes up pretty much every time there is a dinosaur in one of these strips. No one is going to convince the other side with a comment on a comic strip, so why both sides can’t just drop it and treat it as a comic I don’t know. What Nab said in this case was harmless enough, just that there is a lot we don’t know with 100% certainty, and it easily enough could have just died there without having to delve off into the usually digressions.
romart1 over 9 years ago
For all those who like to get into these debates, I used to have a coffee mug that said: “Those who think they know it all upset those of us who do”.
Carl R over 9 years ago
…and this comic is about neither – it’s actually about bullies. In any case, I would disagree with your statement “religion is about 100% certainty” as a general truth since the only religion that I am aware of that claims men are omniscient is Scientology (which claims we are Thetans, and omniscient). Now, if you were to say that “religion is about interpreting the data in a way consistent with an existing world view”, that I would agree with.
Jules934 over 9 years ago
Great Art