Heart of the City by Steenz for June 04, 2010

Nothing like using a forum on a cartoon site, that should be used to appreciate an artist’s work, to promote one’s personal business ventures. Totally crass, I would say.

Spamming should be a capital offense.

Thanks to share flag with you, soccer fan.

wnd: “Capital comment. sir. I say, Capital!”

Okay,you’ll also need bad lighting, no taste and lots of tight clothes for Heart if you really want performance art.

Hey, kids..don’t forget your chalk!!

Need to FLAG all spammers

I did, Retiredgezzer.

so did I.

That was one of the cleverest cartoon series I have ever seen.

I want to thank everyone for getting rid of those spammers before I got here.Thank you!

freeholder: “Okay,you’ll also need bad lighting, no taste and lots of tight clothes for Heart if you really want performance art.”

Hey, there’s a lot of quality performance art out there! The problem is that it’s pretty much indistinguishable from the garbage…

I agree Fritz. Not so much the art as the fact folks THINK they understand what they are doing and have no clue you need the right perspective on life to pull it off.

I do “performance art” quite frequently. Usually the title is “Mom as pack-mule” but it may also be “Mom and 3 young children in ‘herding cats’”.

“Art” being a two-way street, there is of couse the possibility of the audience (whether one person or the mass) getting more out of a piece then the artist put into it, and that’s OK.

I read a commentary on “Alice in Wonderland” saying that the imagery is so symbolically rich in associatiion that’ it’s irrelevant to argue whether Carroll “meant” any particular interpretation of its content (at least to the exclusion of any other interpretation). Information is recieved in the mode of the receiver, and whatever you “get out of” a work is valid, whether or not the artist “put it in”.

All art (perhaps all experience) is fundamentally a Rorschach test…

“Awesome” is a bit much.

Steenz shouldn’t be credited with these strips.