Critics dun us with their dubiously applicable opinions strained through their own filters. I enjoy conversations with such people, but I don’t enjoy reading any critic who takes him or her self too seriously. If even I, the great and powerful K&K, can appreciate that others can have valid and insightful opinions that might change my own, then all critics should leave room for a self-deprecating smile. I say give this strip’s critic a stone tablet and a chisel, and make him publish his review on it. By the time he’s done, we’ll be watching “Jurassic World”.
Am sure someone will think that their technique was used in the caves of France an Spain; but not true.Critics? Well such loved an hated for a long long time. An no admission price? Dat’s another problem since some even demand something for their blab, blab.
Good critics are good writers. Great critics are terrific writers. I always enjoyed reading the reviews of the top theater critics – Kenneth Tynan, George Jean Nathan, Walter Kerr, Alexander Woolcott, Stanley Kauffmann, Robert Brustein – who all displayed a wonderful facility of word craft and an extensive knowledge of dramatic arts..Cinema critics whose essays I have always enjoyed and learned from are writers of the quality of – Glenn Kenny, Vincent Canby, Dilys Powell, James Agee, Anthony Lane, Pauline Kael and André Bazin.
If you want to really learn and understand what film or theatre is about and have an enjoyable reading experience at the same time, I recommend any and all of the above writers.
The criticism I write—not for movies—is usually not so much judgmental as descriptive in such terms as to let the reader decide whether to pursue the item being discussed.
Was that the name of the movie? Firefox is a browser.
As a former communications officer and pilot, I groan at the gross technical inaccuracies in some movies. My wife, the nurse, groans at the medical inaccuracies.
Here’s an idea of just how clueless some critics can be: When The Wizard of Oz premiered in 1939, one critic panned it saying it was “dull and unimaginative.”It seems that the movies critics like the least are the ones I like the most. It’s been this way for a long time.
Heck—most of us Dakotans groaned at the mountains gracing the North Dakota skyline in every landscape scene of the Bakken in “Blood and Oil”—not to mention the locals (all wearing bib overalls) drinking whiskey from the bottle, speaking in Utah/California accents, and generally acting like hooligans from somewhere. The only “North Dakota Nice” was from other immigrants to the boom. The crude oil was thick and black, not light and honey colored. And so on.
“The Librarian swung on….Several times he had to flatten himself against the shelves as a thesaurus thundered by. He waited patiently as a herd of Critters crawled past, grazing on the contents of the choicer books and leaving behind them piles of small slim volumes of literary criticism…”……..Terry Pratchett Guards! Guards!
Kind&Kinder about 9 years ago
Critics dun us with their dubiously applicable opinions strained through their own filters. I enjoy conversations with such people, but I don’t enjoy reading any critic who takes him or her self too seriously. If even I, the great and powerful K&K, can appreciate that others can have valid and insightful opinions that might change my own, then all critics should leave room for a self-deprecating smile. I say give this strip’s critic a stone tablet and a chisel, and make him publish his review on it. By the time he’s done, we’ll be watching “Jurassic World”.
Bilan about 9 years ago
I didn’t know that Michael Bay made movies back in the Stone Age.
Toonerific about 9 years ago
The actors met the critic at the club, afterwards.
StCleve72 about 9 years ago
Rocky pre-I?
Aaberon about 9 years ago
The Critic’s comment: great material I may borrow and save for the next really boring family gathering that I can’t think of a way to get out of.
whiteheron about 9 years ago
Ah! critical thinking…..
HisTyness about 9 years ago
“And with the birth of Art came the inevitable afterbirth: the Art Critic.”
dadoctah about 9 years ago
“Artfully presented, to be sure, but the plot is merely a tired rehash of the movie put out two years ago by the Forest People.”
Lyons Group, Inc. about 9 years ago
Like most comic strips.
lonecat about 9 years ago
Plato’s cave.
dsom8 about 9 years ago
That’s Wiley there, on the right; us on the left.
Linguist about 9 years ago
I give it two Opposable Thumbs Up !!
sarah413 Premium Member about 9 years ago
@HisTyness, History of the World, Pt.I There was much “relief.”
yimhere about 9 years ago
…..and soon to be knocked off his rock….er……?
Vonne Anton about 9 years ago
Isn’t it amazingly silly that people get paid to tell us their opinion?
dabugger about 9 years ago
Am sure someone will think that their technique was used in the caves of France an Spain; but not true.Critics? Well such loved an hated for a long long time. An no admission price? Dat’s another problem since some even demand something for their blab, blab.
Linguist about 9 years ago
Good critics are good writers. Great critics are terrific writers. I always enjoyed reading the reviews of the top theater critics – Kenneth Tynan, George Jean Nathan, Walter Kerr, Alexander Woolcott, Stanley Kauffmann, Robert Brustein – who all displayed a wonderful facility of word craft and an extensive knowledge of dramatic arts..Cinema critics whose essays I have always enjoyed and learned from are writers of the quality of – Glenn Kenny, Vincent Canby, Dilys Powell, James Agee, Anthony Lane, Pauline Kael and André Bazin.
If you want to really learn and understand what film or theatre is about and have an enjoyable reading experience at the same time, I recommend any and all of the above writers.
lesmcf about 9 years ago
When I was a kid (before TV) we used to do that at our parties. I forget what the name for it was, finger something.
JimT8 about 9 years ago
The criticism I write—not for movies—is usually not so much judgmental as descriptive in such terms as to let the reader decide whether to pursue the item being discussed.
paul brians about 9 years ago
A Platonic movie critic!
http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/cave.htm
dflak about 9 years ago
Was that the name of the movie? Firefox is a browser.
As a former communications officer and pilot, I groan at the gross technical inaccuracies in some movies. My wife, the nurse, groans at the medical inaccuracies.
dflak about 9 years ago
P.S. Both of us also groan at these same inaccuracies in the so-called evening news.
Triviaguy about 9 years ago
Here’s an idea of just how clueless some critics can be: When The Wizard of Oz premiered in 1939, one critic panned it saying it was “dull and unimaginative.”It seems that the movies critics like the least are the ones I like the most. It’s been this way for a long time.
klunker rider about 9 years ago
This critic is reviewing a stone age Micheal Bay movie
bmonk about 9 years ago
Heck—most of us Dakotans groaned at the mountains gracing the North Dakota skyline in every landscape scene of the Bakken in “Blood and Oil”—not to mention the locals (all wearing bib overalls) drinking whiskey from the bottle, speaking in Utah/California accents, and generally acting like hooligans from somewhere. The only “North Dakota Nice” was from other immigrants to the boom. The crude oil was thick and black, not light and honey colored. And so on.
I hardly recognized myself.
neeeurothrush about 9 years ago
oh well – wrong firefox i guess
JP Steve Premium Member about 9 years ago
“The Librarian swung on….Several times he had to flatten himself against the shelves as a thesaurus thundered by. He waited patiently as a herd of Critters crawled past, grazing on the contents of the choicer books and leaving behind them piles of small slim volumes of literary criticism…”……..Terry Pratchett Guards! Guards!