Jon: Hey, Garfield! Check out this drawing I did of a pig! I think I really captured its porkness...
*scribble scribble scribble*
Jon: Pigs don't have wings!
Garfield: They will before you can outdraw me, Pablo.
A great reminder from Jim Davis: a comic artist has to be an artist first. The economy and simplicity of a comic artist’s style is the goal, not the starting point – it comes from years of starting with reality and learning to strip away everything that isn’t absolutely necessary.
Thanks for all the years of Garfield, Jim. You rock!
I have to side with “Pablo” on this one -
If I picture a real live adult pig, Jon’s drawing feels right - he does “capture its porkness” (despite the fact that it’s standing up like a person).
Garfield’s portrait on the other hand (although a good likeness of a baby pig), seems unreal or insubstantial in character. It has all the bells and whistles, and it plays on the character of “Babe”, but it doesn’t show a real pig.
Sophistication does not replace character - and an artist must sometimes alter “accuracy” to show individuality.
I’ll go with Porky.
Hmm. I don’t think the pig is quite Orson this time, but he’s pretty close. It’s enough to remind me to post another “Please bring back U.S. Acres!” remark, though.
bestis2come, that is the strangest argument in favor of one piece of art over another that I’ve ever seen.
The winged pig is not only realistic, it’s almost “mythically naturalistic” (with apologies to Jonathon Earl Bowser). These’s nothing unsubstantial about it, quite the contrary. The Orson-like cartoon is just that - a cartoon - yet at its heart it’s no more and no less realistic than the other.
So what you’re saying in the end is that Garfield prefers oranges and you prefer apples.
About the end of “U.S. Acres”, most people couldn’t relate the strip’s more “cerebral” humor to the most successful strip of the 1980’s (actually the comic carried two signatures during its’ final months – as either “Jim Davis/Brett Koth” or “Davis & Koth”), apart from the fact the strip changed styles at a weird pace (These facts brought many criticisms from most cartoonists and readers – specifically about if Davis had any ghostwriters, explaining the “Jim Davis A Fraud” joke on one of the Garfield compilations -, and if a strip is very hated – even if in this case was somewhat exaggerated -, it’s better to end it, and so Orson and the gang moved to television, and the rest is history.
I really wish this comic strip showed more cameo appearances of U.S. Acres characters. What would be even better is if they made a physical appearance in the strip itself.
Llewellenbruce over 14 years ago
Where’s the wheels for the pig?
ladywolf17 over 14 years ago
Both drawings are good.
Kamino Neko over 14 years ago
Orson! That’s where you’ve been!
newworldmozart over 14 years ago
Hey yeah, that is Orson. That is one of the cartoons that I miss with not seeing Garfield any longer.
abatheguy over 14 years ago
We need more cameo appearances of other U.S. Acres characters. Wade and Sheldon rule!
kpreethy over 14 years ago
My garfield is gud artist than jon…..anyway keep it on….GARFIELD
AwesomeComics1982 Premium Member over 14 years ago
No one outdraws Garfield.
peter0423 over 14 years ago
A great reminder from Jim Davis: a comic artist has to be an artist first. The economy and simplicity of a comic artist’s style is the goal, not the starting point – it comes from years of starting with reality and learning to strip away everything that isn’t absolutely necessary.
Thanks for all the years of Garfield, Jim. You rock!
ninmas over 14 years ago
why did US acres end? it was such a great comic strip!
Wildmustang1262 over 14 years ago
Oh JON! You are soooooooo JEALOUS! Just say OINK! OINK!
Good grief! Garfield is right. Jon will not outdraw Garfield for that picture, eh!
Rise22 over 14 years ago
Garfield in on Cartoon Network - can’t remember which days - but he’s on TV again.
bestis2come over 14 years ago
I have to side with “Pablo” on this one - If I picture a real live adult pig, Jon’s drawing feels right - he does “capture its porkness” (despite the fact that it’s standing up like a person). Garfield’s portrait on the other hand (although a good likeness of a baby pig), seems unreal or insubstantial in character. It has all the bells and whistles, and it plays on the character of “Babe”, but it doesn’t show a real pig.
Sophistication does not replace character - and an artist must sometimes alter “accuracy” to show individuality. I’ll go with Porky.
natureboyfig4 Premium Member over 14 years ago
Hmm. I don’t think the pig is quite Orson this time, but he’s pretty close. It’s enough to remind me to post another “Please bring back U.S. Acres!” remark, though.
So here goes:
Please bring back U.S. Acres!
;-)
GargiSanzgiri over 14 years ago
Ohh…Garfield has so many hidden talents!! Doesn’t seem so from his face :-D
carstenk over 14 years ago
I want Sheldon, Lanolin, Wade and Roy back :-)
replay1111 over 14 years ago
Nice nod to the 1990’s Garfield show, with Orson the pig! thumbsup Way to cater to the fans!
burradi1 over 14 years ago
sweet
burradi1 over 14 years ago
sweet
Justice22 over 14 years ago
Jon can outdraw Garfield when pigs fly.
boldyuma over 14 years ago
Looks more like a bear then a pig
Allan CB Premium Member over 14 years ago
Haven’t we all been clamouring for some Orson et al? it appears that Mr. Davis listens to us!
Oh, I love the intro panel! LOL
lin4869 over 14 years ago
Flying pigs say, “Cincinnati.” We have them on steamwheeler smokestacks and we’ve had a contest to decorate them in the past. :-)
chinook2 over 14 years ago
This would be the ultimate Garfield minus Garfield!
Shay over 14 years ago
Awesome. I did not know Garfield knew how to draw.
Rakkav over 14 years ago
bestis2come, that is the strangest argument in favor of one piece of art over another that I’ve ever seen.
The winged pig is not only realistic, it’s almost “mythically naturalistic” (with apologies to Jonathon Earl Bowser). These’s nothing unsubstantial about it, quite the contrary. The Orson-like cartoon is just that - a cartoon - yet at its heart it’s no more and no less realistic than the other.
So what you’re saying in the end is that Garfield prefers oranges and you prefer apples.
trekkermint over 14 years ago
yes, please at least bring back us acres complete a trifecta with garfield and gmg
Bittermelon of Truth over 14 years ago
It’s pretty sad when a cartoonist like Jon is outmastered in simple drawing by his own cat!
Spammer flagged and reported to Knujon.comR. Araya over 12 years ago
About the end of “U.S. Acres”, most people couldn’t relate the strip’s more “cerebral” humor to the most successful strip of the 1980’s (actually the comic carried two signatures during its’ final months – as either “Jim Davis/Brett Koth” or “Davis & Koth”), apart from the fact the strip changed styles at a weird pace (These facts brought many criticisms from most cartoonists and readers – specifically about if Davis had any ghostwriters, explaining the “Jim Davis A Fraud” joke on one of the Garfield compilations -, and if a strip is very hated – even if in this case was somewhat exaggerated -, it’s better to end it, and so Orson and the gang moved to television, and the rest is history.
Neechan801 almost 9 years ago
A cartoonist (draws cartoons) not a realist
jacob.c.bair almost 6 years ago
THEY’LL MAKE MILLIONS!
♞нυитєявσу_z♘ over 5 years ago
I prefer Jon’s better.
ComicFan4Life over 4 years ago
I really wish this comic strip showed more cameo appearances of U.S. Acres characters. What would be even better is if they made a physical appearance in the strip itself.
hockey man over 3 years ago
he did that in seconds???
uqui over 1 year ago
It is kind of sad that Jon is a cartoonist and can’t out draw his cat.