Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for March 11, 2016

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  almost 9 years ago

    Isn’t the entire Republican Party now 20 — if not 30 — clicks to right of Dick Cheney now?

     •  Reply
  2. Right here
    Sherlock Watson  almost 9 years ago

    What about a Lincoln Republican? You know, back when the Republicans were the liberal party?

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    LuvThemPluggers  almost 9 years ago

    Uhh, except for the compassionate part, we may already have that?

     •  Reply
  4. Blunebottle
    blunebottle  almost 9 years ago

    My, your politics (and politicians) are entertaining to us Canucks!

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    kwanza_30303  almost 9 years ago

    Perfect—he should fit right in! But there will be others in the same lane to the nomination.

     •  Reply
  6. Heartcry
    JonGl Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    But that was how Stalin viewed himself!

     •  Reply
  7. Dsc00030
    alviebird  almost 9 years ago

    Why does a candidate need a label? This “party” system is no longer serving the public.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    juicebruce  almost 9 years ago

    Yes we do have a choice between : I-Can and C-Rats…………….Larry Croc !

     •  Reply
  9. 3083024 0826053922 daveb
    Kaputnik  almost 9 years ago

    A compassionate totalitarian dictatorship? Better go with the Democrats.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    jbmlaw01  almost 9 years ago

    Lincoln imprisoned half of the Maryland legislature. Good start, suppose that is why he is still admired.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    eddie6192  almost 9 years ago

    Hey Toon Boy, are you happy with what you started here??? Bring back the Crocs!!!

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    Tom  almost 9 years ago

    Sorry, but the left has Totalitarian dictatorships pretty much monopolized.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Spirit of 76  almost 9 years ago

    Democrats – pro-choice except on guns, healthcare, union membership, light bulbs speech.Republicans – pro freedom except on what you ingest, who you marry, and what you watch.Libertarianism anyone?

     •  Reply
  14. Capture
    BRI-NO-MITE!! Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    A short-fingered vulgarian Republican.

     •  Reply
  15. 00712 whiteheron
    whiteheron  almost 9 years ago

    There’s battle lines being drawnNobody’s right if everybody’s wrong..For What It’s Worth

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    Thanksfortheinfo2000  almost 9 years ago

    I think if Republicans go far enough to the right, they’ll meet the Democrats coming from the left.

     •  Reply
  17. 689 6897683 blue rebel alliance logo png transparent png
    KEA  almost 9 years ago

    see comments. this is why i don’t identify with a party. I only identify with a philosophy – the one on which the country was founded.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    richbenj  almost 9 years ago

    So, Rat, you’re aiming to be the Republican Obama?

     •  Reply
  19. Horseshoes3
    McGehee  almost 9 years ago

    I’m not sure which is the more effective parody of Trumpism: Rat, or the typical political discussion in any internet comment thread.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    david  almost 9 years ago

    totaliarism is far left, not right. Far Right is Anarchy.

     •  Reply
  21. Urban lakshmi
    Bucinka  almost 9 years ago

    It’s not just linear, folks:

    https://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/quiz.php?iframe=true&width=850&height=100%

     •  Reply
  22. Thinker
    Sisyphos  almost 9 years ago

    A rather well-off friend of mine used to be described (by a mutual friend) as somewhat to the right of Louis XIV. Rat, however, is mistaken if he thinks he can be both totalitarian and compassionate at the same time.Long live Rat!How much will your vote for Rat cost?

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    jd wigman  almost 9 years ago

    http://www.wimp.com/thegovernment/

     •  Reply
  24. Img 0041
    Dapperdan61  Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    I used to identify more as an Independent & would vote for moderate Republicans from time to time. These days I’m a solid Democrat but I don’t blindly vote Blue every time. When it comes to the Presidency I will always vote Democrat however since the Republican nominees are simply intolerable even more so this year. The only remaining candidate I can stomach is John Kasich. Obviously he won’t be the nominee

     •  Reply
  25. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  almost 9 years ago

    Joseph McCarthy

     •  Reply
  26. Tj avatar sw
    tjimlee  almost 9 years ago

    so Rat’s a democrat?

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    darleen  almost 9 years ago

    In other words, he is running as Bernie Sanders.

     •  Reply
  28. Blunebottle
    blunebottle  almost 9 years ago

    Food for thought for all of you political commenters that think there is a distinction between Elephant & Donkey…..One of the most effective devices in the salesman’s toolkit is the illusion of choice- always give the prospect 2 things to choose from. For instance: “I have time Tuesday or Thursday, which is better for you?” “Morning or afternoon?”In the case of your politics, it is always one of two choices. (We in Canada have many, but I"m not going to get into that…it has it’s own baggage.) But here’s my point: you think you made a difference voting for Obama after Bush? The same power brokers put BOTH of them into office! Do some research and find out how many members of the Trilateral Commission each of them put into their administrations.“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws” — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

     •  Reply
  29. Art1c 2
    dre7861  almost 9 years ago

    Rat’s going to be Donald Trump?

     •  Reply
  30. Airbrush 20240305192116
    Number Three  almost 9 years ago

    Were you saying something, Rat?

    xxx

     •  Reply
  31. Photo0207
    jenifer flower  almost 9 years ago

    that’s not fun- that’s just ignorant- conflating Bernie & democratic socialism with communism is a Faux News talking point… get your head out of your hind cheeks & actually think…

     •  Reply
  32. Photo0207
    jenifer flower  almost 9 years ago

    amerikkka already has 3 candidates who are aiming to be compassionate totalitarian dictators- T-rump, Crazy Cruz, and $hrilary

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    echoraven  almost 9 years ago

    technically it would be to the left of communism.

     •  Reply
  34. Hellcat
    knight1192a  almost 9 years ago

    Think that’s actually the name of one of the actual third parties that does or has existed in this country in the last forty years.

     •  Reply
  35. Avatar
    Kristiaan  almost 9 years ago

    Mine would be uncompassionate totalitarian dictatorship.

     •  Reply
  36. Snoopy
    The Fly Hunter  almost 9 years ago

    The USA was once a nation that was made great by consensus but which is now being destroyed by polarization. Think about it!

     •  Reply
  37.  chevy
    Lyman Elliott Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    I never realized that Rat was really Donald Trump in disguise.

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    Mary McNeil Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    They’ll split the vote !

     •  Reply
  39. Missing large 2
    Phatts  almost 9 years ago

    While it can be said that today’s Republican Party is not the Party of Lincoln, it can also be said that today’s Democrat Party is not the Party of Kennedy.It’s funny listening to Hillary and Sanders arguing over which one is going to give out more Free Pizza than the other. Today’s Democrats are unashamedly Socialist, no matter whether they call themselves “progressive” or “liberal” or “leftist” or whatever.The bottom line is, Republicans have their extremists, and so do the Democrats. Neither one is any good for the nation.

     •  Reply
  40. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Polarization is nothing new in American politics. There was contention over the controversial abolition movement right from the start, and the balance of slave states to free states maintained by swaying the territories to one position or the other before they would be allowed statehood eventually led to a civil war that nearly destroyed the Union, cost hundreds of thousands of lives and entirely wiped out the wealth and sovereignty of the southern states. There were fist-fights and duels fought between statesmen. The nation was born in a state of polarization between Loyalists and Patriots.People who cannot support their opinions by rational means will often resort to bemoaning the polarization and divisive and controversial stance of their opposition, the last bit of moral high ground left to them in the rising tide of history.

     •  Reply
  41. Missing large
    Mr.doom  almost 9 years ago

    Brass Orchid said it all very well.

     •  Reply
  42. Oldman with a hat
    OldManMontgomery  almost 9 years ago

    “Compassionate Totalitarian Dictatorship”? That is the Democrat Party agenda. The Government controls everything – for your own good, of course.

     •  Reply
  43. 2541 6924938
    mjb515  almost 9 years ago

    They told me if if I voted Republican we’d have an out of control executive who ignores the law, civil rights and would start wars without a by your leave from Congress.

    What do you know? We do!

     •  Reply
  44. Missing large
    Endersteve1027  over 7 years ago

    My dad is about 1000000 clicks to the right

     •  Reply
  45. Fef7746f 6d27 4be5 b7aa c106b3d16782
    LOAFY  almost 4 years ago

    Pig would’ve been right in the June 16, 2014 if he had asked a couple years earlier.

     •  Reply
  46. Marty scream
    cs2854900  almost 3 years ago

    Trump:70 clicks to dick cheny far right

     •  Reply
  47. Stpatshat  1
    leopardglily  almost 2 years ago

    Sorry Rat, I hate you now.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine