Frazz by Jef Mallett for October 23, 2018

  1. Sylvester1
    Nachikethass  about 6 years ago

    I think Mrs Olsen scored here!

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    asrialfeeple  about 6 years ago

    Mrs. Olsen is getting wise to his tricks.

     •  Reply
  3. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  about 6 years ago

    But Caulfield’s conclusion just proved he did get zero back.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Uncle Bob  about 6 years ago

    Don’t make an asymtope of yourself, Caulfield!

     •  Reply
  5. Download
    cervelo  about 6 years ago

    The parallel Caulfield is trying to draw between fraction math and flying fish is pretty goofy. I don’t get it anyways. I think Mrs. Olsen is a pretty good sport not pointing it out too harshly.

     •  Reply
  6. Atajayhawk
    atajayhawk  about 6 years ago

    Dang! Mrs Olsen’s getting GOOD!

     •  Reply
  7. 000 0557
    Darwinskeeper  about 6 years ago

    I love Ms. Olsen’s answer, its nice to see her take on Caufield at his own game.

     •  Reply
  8. 0584 l
    1MadHat Premium Member about 6 years ago

    You don’t have to wade to where the flying fish fly. That’s what they make boats for. You can even fish for any fish with a fly.

    I’m not sure that shark flyfishing will catch on, though… And you can always divide a fraction by itself and get one… 8^)

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    Grutzi  about 6 years ago

    He was bested by his own rules of rational or hoisted by his own petard.

     •  Reply
  10. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo]  about 6 years ago

    PostsFrazz16 hrs ·

    Nature abhors a vacuum, and math doesn’t seem to especially like zero. I get that, but can I explain it? As the saying goes,

    I got nothin’.

     •  Reply
  11. 197675d5 3ec6 4190 bcd4 01474769dce6
    Earthling Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Caulfield, that = 1

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Frazz