There are lots of pictures of old stars. I know they are stars because I have heard of them. I know they are old because, if I’ve heard of them, they probably already dead.
But it’s still expanding slower than the speed of light. So if we point a powerful telescope away from the center, we should be able to see beyond the current edge and settle the question of what’s beyond everything.
if the mass of the universe is sufficient enough the curve of space will be close in on itself. so all you would see is the other side of the universe. in other words " the other side of the mountain.
I am a skeptic. The only clue we have is doppler shift in stars with (presumed) increasing distance, and from that we infer the stars are moving away at some particular speed. However, since we have no idea what relativistic forces apply across such extreme distances I think it is a premature assumption. It s entirely possible the universe is collapsing and without an understanding of grand scale relativistic effects we would not have a clue.
Mikaele Premium Member almost 6 years ago
I think he meant “evidence” rather than “evident”
Anathema Premium Member almost 6 years ago
We’ve been taking pictures. Will there be any humans around then?
alasko almost 6 years ago
Their furnace conk out?
ShadeBlackfox almost 6 years ago
Hey, the hat is back! Reminds me a bit of the one worn by Doctor Zhivago, although it looked better on Omar Sharif.
Robin Harwood almost 6 years ago
There are lots of pictures of old stars. I know they are stars because I have heard of them. I know they are old because, if I’ve heard of them, they probably already dead.
William Bednar Premium Member almost 6 years ago
Don’t worry, Arlo, no Humans will be around to care.
well-i-never almost 6 years ago
Is he going out with binoculars?
Nighthawks Premium Member almost 6 years ago
if you’re hungry, you want food. if you’re cold, you want to be warm; every day life has a way of keeping folks grounded
micromos almost 6 years ago
There is nothing to slow them down.
DDrazen almost 6 years ago
Empty nesters. Project much?
Skeptical Meg almost 6 years ago
But it’s still expanding slower than the speed of light. So if we point a powerful telescope away from the center, we should be able to see beyond the current edge and settle the question of what’s beyond everything.
formathe almost 6 years ago
Reality is, by the time the last star beyond ours winks out, mankind (person kind) will long be gone from this rock.
kunddog almost 6 years ago
if the mass of the universe is sufficient enough the curve of space will be close in on itself. so all you would see is the other side of the universe. in other words " the other side of the mountain.
JohnHarry Premium Member almost 6 years ago
Janice is forever the optimist.
flagmichael almost 6 years ago
I am a skeptic. The only clue we have is doppler shift in stars with (presumed) increasing distance, and from that we infer the stars are moving away at some particular speed. However, since we have no idea what relativistic forces apply across such extreme distances I think it is a premature assumption. It s entirely possible the universe is collapsing and without an understanding of grand scale relativistic effects we would not have a clue.
KEA almost 6 years ago
bummer
DCBakerEsq almost 6 years ago
This explains my expanding waistline.
Lightpainter almost 6 years ago
Current research indicates the universe will stop expanding at some point, then collapse back on itself
thuddriver01 almost 6 years ago
The thing is if we are all moving at the same rate nothing will change.
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] almost 6 years ago
No apparent heat death crunch now.
David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace almost 6 years ago
GETCHER PITURES NOW, WHILE THERE’S STILL TIME
A fine selling point for photography possibilities.
(And, yes, I intended that spelling of pictures, same as my version of “get your”. …and the placement of the periods here.)