Prickly City by Scott Stantis for January 25, 2020

  1. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    You’ve moved to Iran.

     •  Reply
  2. 1djojn
    RobinHood  almost 5 years ago

    We didn’t start the fire

    It was always burning

    Since the world’s been turning

    We didn’t start the fire

    No, we didn’t light it

    But we tried to fight it

    Billy Joel

     •  Reply
  3. Cheshirecat chandra complg 1024
    Silly Season   almost 5 years ago

    Hey @45Nasrad!

    Here’s another Faux News cite for you!

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trumps-senate-impeachment-trial-judge-andrew-napolitanoBy Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

    ~

    The House of Representatives — in proceedings in which the president chose not to participate — impeached Trump for abuse of power and contempt of Congress.

    The abuse consists of his efforts to extract a personal political “favor” from the president of Ukraine as a precondition to the delivery of $391 million in military aid.

    The favor he wanted was an announcement of a Ukrainian investigation of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden and his son Hunter.

    The Government Accountability Office — a nonpartisan entity in the federal government that monitors how the feds spend tax revenue — has concluded that Trump’s request for a favor was a violation of law because only Congress can impose conditions on government expenditures.

    So, when the president did that, he usurped Congress’ role and acted unlawfully.

    The Constitution prescribes the bases for impeachment as treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

    However, this use of the word “crimes” does not refer to violations of federal criminal statutes. It refers to behavior that is so destructive of the constitutional order that it is the moral equivalent of statutory crimes.

    For example, as others have suggested, if the president moved to Russia and ran the executive branch from there, or if he announced that Roman Catholics were unfit for office, he would not have committed any crimes.

    Yet, surely, these acts would be impeachable because, when done by the president, they are the moral equivalent of crimes and are so far removed from constitutional norms as to be impeachable.

     •  Reply
  4. Cheshirecat chandra complg 1024
    Silly Season   almost 5 years ago

    Continued…

    In Trump’s case, though the House chose delicately not to accuse the president of specific crimes, there is enough evidence here to do so.

    Federal election laws proscribe as criminal the mere solicitation of help for a political campaign from a foreign national or government.

    There is no dispute that Trump did this. In fact, the case for this is stronger now than it was when the House impeached him last year. Since then, more evidence, which Trump tried to suppress, has come to light.

    That evidence consists of administration officials’ emails that were obtained by the media pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. Those emails demonstrate conclusively that Trump ordered a halt on the release of the $391 million within minutes of his favor request, and the aid sat undistributed until congressional pressure became too much for Trump to bear.

    This implicates two other crimes. One is bribery — the refusal to perform a government obligation until a thing of value is delivered, whether the thing of value — here, the announcement of a Ukrainian investigation of the Bidens — arrives or not. The other is contempt of Congress.

    If the request for the announcement of an investigation of the Bidens manifested “nothing wrong” as Trump has claimed, why did he whisper it in secret, rather than order it of the Department of Justice?

     •  Reply
  5. Kw eyecon 20190702 091103 r
    Kip W  almost 5 years ago

    45Nasrad about 4 hours ago

    This comic is a visualization of what goes on in the minds of Dem/socialist/communist/liberals when they are reminded of the great things for our Country that President Donald J. Trump has accomplished in a mere 3 years, I can’t wait for the next 5

    And once again, the first targeted insult drone of the day comes from the right, to be followed shortly by targeted explainers from the same direction on how that’s not reeeeeeally personal or insulting and anyway a Democrat said something worse this one time.

     •  Reply
  6. Image
    Brain Pudding  almost 5 years ago

    Hey Mr. Stantis, didn’t you just spend a week complaining about all the stress people are riling up? Didn’t you just suggest that we all need to take a chill pill?

    Now you put forth hyperbolic fear mongering nonsense that only exists in the minds of those who like to push fear and dread. You are being part of the problem.

    Read your strip from last few days. It is time to focus on the positive and stop pushing the false doomsday narratives that is simply cold propaganda by aparachiks!

    You should start doing strips that highlight the realities of an America that is dong better economically, less engaged in military conflicts, earning respct on the world stage, solving trade imbalances that have existed for decades, and standing up for life, individual dignity and freedom. Commenting on these truths and ridiculing the nattering nabobs of negativity would serve America in a much better way.

    God bless.

     •  Reply
  7. German typewriter detail small
    Cheapskate0  almost 5 years ago

    Who needs drones when you have global warming!

     •  Reply
  8. Oceandriftwood
    Phrosty 12Oaks  almost 5 years ago

    Drones of War? A play on Dogs of War?

     •  Reply
  9. 1djojn
    RobinHood  almost 5 years ago

    Get out of California, and stop ordering stuff from Amazon.

     •  Reply
  10. Clipboard 1
    Rista  almost 5 years ago

    Never say it couldn’t get any worse. The universe ALWAYS accepts the challenge.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    ZeebaNeighba1985  almost 5 years ago

    You shouldn’t compare politicians to rats. One is a disgusting creature that’s spreads disease, and steals whatever it can get it’s filthy paws on. The other is a mouse.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Prickly City