“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
===
All real Republicans agree. Any who don’t are RINOs.
The important point to consider here is that Billary I, Bush 43, and Obama all undertook equivalent “un-Constitutional” measures, from the PATRIOT Act to a slew of Obama mandates, using such things as “executive orders” and “signing statements.”
I’ve long said that the key to Trump’s political success (such as it is/was) was stealing the Democrats’ strategy playbooks (much of which was derived directly from Alinskey’s “Rules For Radicals”) and using their tactics against them FAR better than they ever did against Republicans. Everything from getting a charismatic, populist political “neophyte” or “outsider” to exploiting tribalism and divisions among the public. This was part of why I loathed Trump from the beginning—if it was wrong for the Dems, it was wrong for Trump. And if you complain about Trump (as you should), you should also have complained about Obama and the party whose playbooks Trump stole (which you should). Virtually everything wrong with the Obama and Trump years was practically foretold in Jonah Goldberg’s 2007 book “Liberal Fascism”—including the wannabe-“Fascists” of the Left turning their accusations of “Fascism” against their opposition, in Orwellian “1984” doublespeak.
Darsan54 Premium Member almost 2 years ago
Well, maybe the (real) Civil War ……. you know the one they won’t let Florida or Texas students learn about.
electricshadow Premium Member almost 2 years ago
Maybe someone will nominate #45 if Kevin McCarthy fails another vote for Speaker.
braindead Premium Member almost 2 years ago
“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
===
All real Republicans agree. Any who don’t are RINOs.
ibFrank almost 2 years ago
If you throw out the Constitution how can you have a goverment or elections?
ajr58(1) almost 2 years ago
Some names are ever so appropriate. It was probably killed by Q. There was no fraud. Stop crying
Objective Turnip almost 2 years ago
This was created before Trump’s speech was untangled and clarified.
PoodleGroomer almost 2 years ago
I was hoping that was his hair on fire.
kaffekup almost 2 years ago
Once again, that’s not something Winslow would say.
Still, I’m astonished that I’ve ‘liked’ the last couple of Prickly City strips.
LNER4472 Premium Member almost 2 years ago
The important point to consider here is that Billary I, Bush 43, and Obama all undertook equivalent “un-Constitutional” measures, from the PATRIOT Act to a slew of Obama mandates, using such things as “executive orders” and “signing statements.”
I’ve long said that the key to Trump’s political success (such as it is/was) was stealing the Democrats’ strategy playbooks (much of which was derived directly from Alinskey’s “Rules For Radicals”) and using their tactics against them FAR better than they ever did against Republicans. Everything from getting a charismatic, populist political “neophyte” or “outsider” to exploiting tribalism and divisions among the public. This was part of why I loathed Trump from the beginning—if it was wrong for the Dems, it was wrong for Trump. And if you complain about Trump (as you should), you should also have complained about Obama and the party whose playbooks Trump stole (which you should). Virtually everything wrong with the Obama and Trump years was practically foretold in Jonah Goldberg’s 2007 book “Liberal Fascism”—including the wannabe-“Fascists” of the Left turning their accusations of “Fascism” against their opposition, in Orwellian “1984” doublespeak.