There are lots of “independent” voters, which in my mind includes those otherwise labelled as “non-partisan” or follow any of the multitude of “third parties” (are there any fourth and fifth parties?), and perhaps even “swing voters”. I remember that my mother was supposedly registered as “declined to state” (in California in the 1970’s). Still, I think most “independents” will vote as either D or R. Of course there have been several semi-viable third party or independents over the last few decades (George Wallace in 1968; John Anderson in 1980; and Ross Perot in 1992 [and 1996?] come to mind).
I used to belong to one of the parties, but had to change to independent because I couldn’t support a straight party line on either side. In most elections I liked candidates on both sides for different reasons.
Kiba65 about 1 year ago
She may have made a point!!!
Skeptical Meg about 1 year ago
Independence is not for the sheep, but for the shepherd.
Lee26 Premium Member about 1 year ago
I’d vote for her. Beats the other candidates. Who’d be her VP?
davanden about 1 year ago
So they can see the spelling in each other’s word balloons?
Teto85 Premium Member about 1 year ago
Yah. She’d make Meg Whitman or Carly Fiorina look good.
WF11 about 1 year ago
There are lots of “independent” voters, which in my mind includes those otherwise labelled as “non-partisan” or follow any of the multitude of “third parties” (are there any fourth and fifth parties?), and perhaps even “swing voters”. I remember that my mother was supposedly registered as “declined to state” (in California in the 1970’s). Still, I think most “independents” will vote as either D or R. Of course there have been several semi-viable third party or independents over the last few decades (George Wallace in 1968; John Anderson in 1980; and Ross Perot in 1992 [and 1996?] come to mind).
contralto2b about 1 year ago
I used to belong to one of the parties, but had to change to independent because I couldn’t support a straight party line on either side. In most elections I liked candidates on both sides for different reasons.