Brewster Rockit by Tim Rickard for October 06, 2023

  1. Avatar200
    Izzy Moreno  over 1 year ago

    Yep.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    ekke  over 1 year ago

    Yeah, but the typical grant is how many exponentials beyond $20?

     •  Reply
  3. Th marvin da martian
    Flashaaway  over 1 year ago

    Wrong, it was the egg. On the planet long before feathers.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Panufo  over 1 year ago

    Touché, Rickard.

     •  Reply
  5. 48386604 10213532462001976 5743891912218116096 n
    My First Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Just ask Faucci.

     •  Reply
  6. Image
    Lenavid  over 1 year ago

    Definitely how Climate Change science works…

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    ekw555  over 1 year ago

    that’s how we all work.

    for pay.

     •  Reply
  8. Nollanav
    DaBump Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Oh yes. But you also need to add all the academics teaching that the chicken came first, and all the science journals that have declared that the other view is unscientific and only “the chicken came first” papers will be published and anything else won’t even get to peer review. Science marches on! But only within its own version of a PC box.

    Nah, that’s unfair, 99% of science — physics, chemistry, aerodynamics, etc. — doesn’t have that problem, it’s just certain areas that have gone beyond the proper bounds of science (hence the demarcation problem) or involve big business and all that money.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    steveconkey2003  over 1 year ago

    That’s exactly why “scientists” and the media push climate change daily.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    geese28  over 1 year ago

    Of course that’s how science works…..only with several more zeros

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    James Gifford Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Well, it’s the rooster, but not in a family strip.

     •  Reply
  12. Cw avatar006
    blakerl  over 1 year ago

    It’s still the Egg.

     •  Reply
  13. Graceeyepatch large
    Teresa Burritt (Frog Applause) creator over 1 year ago

    Money talks.

     •  Reply
  14. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  over 1 year ago

    Nope.

     •  Reply
  15. Kirby close up with poppies behind   close cropped
    mistercatworks  over 1 year ago

    It’s not good when 8 of the 11 authors of a published paper on “room temperature superconductors” ask that the publication be withdrawn due to “problems” with the data. It gives science a bad name when publish-or-perish takes precedence over fact. If you want to deal with gray areas, become a politician.

     •  Reply
  16. Stinker
    cuzinron47  over 1 year ago

    In other words, for a price, I’ll tell you what you want to know.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    newyorkslim  over 1 year ago

    Ouch! sad but true.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    Buckeye67  over 1 year ago

    Bad enough that Dr. Mel is a mad scientist, but he is a cheap mad scientist to boot.

     •  Reply
  19. Bluedog
    Bilan  over 1 year ago

    Trump science: Trump says he doesn’t believe it, the Republicans say that all of the science contradicting him is wrong.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    exitseven  over 1 year ago

    Thats how global warming works.

     •  Reply
  21. Img 20241102 155448733
    David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace  over 1 year ago

    All things being equal, money introduces an inequality.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    FireAnt_Hater  over 1 year ago

    Crest has been shown to be an effective decay-preventive dentifrice, that can be of significant value when combined with a conscientiously-applied program of oral hygiene and regular professional care.

    Council on Dental Therapeutics – American Dental Association…

    Learned the above from the box of a tube of Crest toothpast, back in 1963.

    And the ‘of significant value’ part simply means that it’s better to brush your teeth than not brush them. LOL – that would be true if one used zero toothpaste and just brushed them…

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    norphos  over 1 year ago

    Sadly it is as easy to buy a scientist as it is to buy a politician. Scientists tend to agree with whomever is providing their funding.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    stamps  over 1 year ago

    Fill out this grant form..

     •  Reply
  25. Inkblot2
    Ink blot Premium Member over 1 year ago

    The egg came first — it was laid by an almost-but-not-quite-fully-evolved near-chicken creature.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    paullp Premium Member over 1 year ago

    My faith in Dr. Mel, mad scientist, was almost restored. There he is, in panel two, refuting Brewster’s ignorance of the scientific method. Then I foolishly went on to panel three . . .

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    R.U. Kidding  over 1 year ago

    More like $20 million.

     •  Reply
  28. Th 2434264126
    Snoots  over 1 year ago

    The chicken or the egg controversy has always struck me as so. extremely. goofy. It’s like asking how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. My answer: “Why would angels want to dance on the head of a pin in the first place?”

    Honestly, some questions are simply stupid from the outset.

    I mean think about it: saying the egg came first is assuming the mutation occurred in the egg… and not in the chicken that laid it. There is nothing that states mutation occurs at any specific time or moment. Further, this question exists only if one believes that evolution is absolute fact (rather than theory), and has no validity if one believes in intelligent creation.

    So, goofy question. For those of faith it has no relevance at all. And for evolutionists, since the point of mutation cannot be established, there is no answer to this questions.

    My recommendation: do something more valuable with one’s limited days on this earth. Even watching cartoons would be more educational than the silly debate about chickens and eggs. ;D

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Brewster Rockit