Google will give you results that make you want to click them. Duckduckgo not so much. The Google (and Bing and Chrome) system puts you into an island of answers that will seldom show you a new idea or a competing concern. Because amplifying your preexisting state pays them better.
I don’t agree. Google puts an astouding amount of knowledge at your fingertips 24/7. Sure, as with any source of info, you have to use discernment. But… you remeber that obnoxious uncle who spewed endless malarkey at Christmas parties when the library was closed? Well he’s not so cocky anymore.
When I enter an uncertainly worded search item, Google often refines it, and that sometimes works out ok. But, there also show up lists of questions asked by others, which help me refine my search even more precisely. So it ain’t all bad or all good, mostly it’s just helpful.
“Working an integral or performing a linear regression is something a computer can do quite effectively. Understanding whether the result makes sense — or deciding whether the method is the right one to use in the first place — requires a guiding human hand. When we teach mathematics we are supposed to be explaining how to be that guide. A math course that fails to do so is essentially training the student to be a very slow, buggy version of Microsoft Excel.” —Jordan Ellenberg, professor of mathematics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, How Not To Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking (2014)
Using a search engine to find an answer is easy; taking the first thing it gives, without confirmation, is lazy. Doing an easy first step can move a hard worker more quickly along in an arduous task.
My entire career I was asked how to you get all that done so quickly. My reply, “I’m lazy and the easiest way is also the quickest way.” Then I would get fussed at because I also came in under budget (bad for some reason).
Limpid Lizard 12 months ago
Gimme a stinking break, Mallett! Lazy, why exactly???
Concretionist 12 months ago
Google will give you results that make you want to click them. Duckduckgo not so much. The Google (and Bing and Chrome) system puts you into an island of answers that will seldom show you a new idea or a competing concern. Because amplifying your preexisting state pays them better.
ChukLitl Premium Member 12 months ago
Bing gets evasive when you ask if it’s sentient. It doesn’t know what that means, either.
cervelo 12 months ago
I don’t agree. Google puts an astouding amount of knowledge at your fingertips 24/7. Sure, as with any source of info, you have to use discernment. But… you remeber that obnoxious uncle who spewed endless malarkey at Christmas parties when the library was closed? Well he’s not so cocky anymore.
Geophyzz 12 months ago
65 years ago, we replaced our mop & squeegee with an electric scrubber and wet vac.
DaBump Premium Member 12 months ago
It’s a sliding variable, not a constant.
goboboyd 12 months ago
He might break AI testing that theory.
sandpiper 12 months ago
When I enter an uncertainly worded search item, Google often refines it, and that sometimes works out ok. But, there also show up lists of questions asked by others, which help me refine my search even more precisely. So it ain’t all bad or all good, mostly it’s just helpful.
The Wolf In Your Midst 12 months ago
“Progress isn’t made by early risers. It’s made by lazy men trying to find easier ways to do something.” – Robert Heinlein
Richard S Russell Premium Member 12 months ago
For any given complex, expensive, time-consuming problem there exists at least one simple, cheap, easy wrong answer.
Richard S Russell Premium Member 12 months ago
“Working an integral or performing a linear regression is something a computer can do quite effectively. Understanding whether the result makes sense — or deciding whether the method is the right one to use in the first place — requires a guiding human hand. When we teach mathematics we are supposed to be explaining how to be that guide. A math course that fails to do so is essentially training the student to be a very slow, buggy version of Microsoft Excel.” —Jordan Ellenberg, professor of mathematics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, How Not To Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking (2014)
Mike Baldwin creator 12 months ago
Google will do the thinking, you just sit back and consume.
P51Strega 12 months ago
Using a search engine to find an answer is easy; taking the first thing it gives, without confirmation, is lazy. Doing an easy first step can move a hard worker more quickly along in an arduous task.
haasmeister 12 months ago
My entire career I was asked how to you get all that done so quickly. My reply, “I’m lazy and the easiest way is also the quickest way.” Then I would get fussed at because I also came in under budget (bad for some reason).
eced52 12 months ago
No, that’s Siri.
Bilan 12 months ago
Lazy is when you don’t even want to bother Google-ing something.
Otis Rufus Driftwood 12 months ago
I don’t really think ‘easy’ is portmanteau like Caulfield think. It would have the same root as ‘ease’ though.
unfair.de 12 months ago
Eazy: E + azy is 1 plus 3 letters. So it’s 1/9th efficiency plus 3/4 lazy.