Swiss cheese has lots of holes. The more holes you have, the less cheese you have. The more cheese you have, the more holes you have. Thus, the more cheese you have, the less cheese you have.
Thusly…
McKenzie has lots of holes. The more holes you have, the less McKenzie you have. The more McKenzie you have, the more holes you have. Thus, the more McKenzie you have, the less McKenzie you have.
Yakety Sax 6 months ago
Like a Gordian knot.
some idiot from R'lyeh Premium Member 6 months ago
The mathematicians can’t follow her of course, because they’d bias the sample.
markkahler52 6 months ago
It still doesn’t add up. But, once it does, it’ll equal 42. Count on it ;)
WaitingMan 6 months ago
The mathematicians are getting away from trying to prove that silly Riemann Hypothesis and starting to work on something really important.
Steverino Premium Member 6 months ago
I thought paradox was two physicians.
Brass Orchid Premium Member 6 months ago
Popularity is not rational. Try applying Pi to your radius to calculate the circumference of your circle of influence.
Mario500 6 months ago
(senses steady parabox (paradox + box) opening in this cartoon)
darcyandsimon 6 months ago
This is just TOO funny! Sorry, McKenzie!
Brilliant_Birdie 6 months ago
Maybe the paradox could help with rent
Aladar30 Premium Member 6 months ago
I think McKenzie should be proud of that. It’s pretty impressive.
Buoy 6 months ago
This reminds me of the Swiss cheese paradox:
Swiss cheese has lots of holes. The more holes you have, the less cheese you have. The more cheese you have, the more holes you have. Thus, the more cheese you have, the less cheese you have.
Thusly…
McKenzie has lots of holes. The more holes you have, the less McKenzie you have. The more McKenzie you have, the more holes you have. Thus, the more McKenzie you have, the less McKenzie you have.
Let it ever be so…
MichaelD Premium Member 5 months ago
And her tanking is like a tank.