Prickly City by Scott Stantis for July 23, 2009

  1. Don quixote 1955
    OmqR-IV.0  almost 15 years ago

    Hitler had a vision (and possibly heard voices) and was a socialising nationalist .

    (oh no! Godwin’s Law :p )

     •  Reply
  2. Horseshoes3
    McGehee  almost 15 years ago

    Hitler didn’t have a vision, he had a delusion. Slight difference.

     •  Reply
  3. Echo
    MotherOfMoses  almost 15 years ago

    McGehee, I think delusions are visions only that, they are deceitful.

     •  Reply
  4. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    You want wonder and the spirit of exploration, you can get that from Hubble photographs and unmanned probes and robot landers. If you want adventure, go out and make your OWN. If you want a couple of new rocks to look at in the Smithsonian, send someone back to the moon (or to Mars)…

    The purpose of space research is to expand the boundaries of our knowledge, not make great television, or to push pins in a map of the sky and say “Been there. Been there. Haven’t been there. Been there.”

     •  Reply
  5. Me 3 23 2020
    ChukLitl Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    If we, or a comet, destroy this planet, it would be handy to have some people elsewhere.

     •  Reply
  6. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    We’re a long way from having the capability to establish any sort of self-sustaining colony, ANYWHERE, and the technology required to do so can be developed here on earth. Before we try sending people into the great beyond, let’s at least find someplace that might be suitable to send them.

     •  Reply
  7. Irish clover.svg
    johnnydoc5  almost 15 years ago

    It would be handy to destroy another planet wouldn’t it. No worries Chuklitl, I jest. The unsettling thing is that it might not be a joke in the future.

     •  Reply
  8. Me 3 23 2020
    ChukLitl Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    Domes on barren rocks beat extinction, but keep the robot idea. The best Mars plan I’ve heard is robot factories, there, to produce air & fuel before anyone leaves Earth.

     •  Reply
  9. Pict0026
    caddy.1957  almost 15 years ago

    ChukLit shouldn’t we get a second opinion?…I’m sure Marvin Maartian is open to giving suggestions

     •  Reply
  10. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member almost 15 years ago

    Terraforming is an option, but it’s a LONG way from being workable. Remember, if we’re talking about a colony that could act as an “ark” in case of earthly extinction, it will need to be FULLY self-supporting. If all they’re going to be is a last gasp of survivors who live ling enough to write a history of the death of Earth (like the Australians in “On The Beach”), there ain’t a lot of point.

     •  Reply
  11. 545555 sm
    Carole Siegel  almost 15 years ago

    But we won’t know for sure whether colonies and terraforming can or can’t work until we actually try. That should have been the next step after going to the moon - setting up colonies on (or actually in) the moon to see if they could be done successfully.

     •  Reply
  12. Bly head2
    Bill_Wa  almost 15 years ago

    They didn’t get laid off, they quit.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Prickly City