The NYT will protect your left and entitle you to free government mental health care. Believe it and you likely will be homelessOn the otherhand, the WSJ provides full coverage without the fold that can blow away at the first disturbance, Admittedly smaller, the Journal does not print all the sh— that’s unfit to print. As opposed to the Times, they print hard truth. No fairy tale kingdoms with falsely imprisoned criminals, government workers who work magic, and stable hands who see truth, the WSJ brings stories those liberal rags will not touch. It also folds into a tricornered hat to show your patrioism.NYT or WSJ. 11% historical average or Land of ID T-Bill 3/4%You may not believe The Street. Do you believe ID?Some VERY good buys today in the WSJ
and in the winter, if you want better protection, raid a dumster and get a couple of those 30-gallon Hefty trash bags for a rain/wind proof suit. nobody uses newspapers anymore when you can boost a blanket or coat from a goodwill drop box.
The GOP and the Tea Partyers have really got their way with spending cuts supposedly to reduce the deficit. In reality their program amounts to a very effective Jobs Elimination Program: Nobody is spending on anything so nobody is buying anything so nobody can afford to employ anybody and the economy goes down the tube not just here but around the globe. (Strange that there was a big deficit at the beginning of the Clinton Administration and no deficit at the end—and not a lot of painful s**t during the Clinton years…got to be a lesson in there somewhere) And now liberals from the President on down are being blamed for what the Tea Party has foisted on the country. Anybody see the logic in this?
basilisk over 13 years ago
Guys, that one was from the New Yorker in the 1930s
Llewellenbruce over 13 years ago
There’s not many homeless shelters in Id.
hsawlrae over 13 years ago
History repeats itself
Hillbillyman over 13 years ago
They need to be under the bench for better coverage.
Jeciel over 13 years ago
Check out Aug 4 of Lio. With what shall we cover our heads from the rain when newspapers cease?
gjsjr41 over 13 years ago
WTF…..raining with the moon out? Must be the Wiz at work.
lewisbower over 13 years ago
The NYT will protect your left and entitle you to free government mental health care. Believe it and you likely will be homelessOn the otherhand, the WSJ provides full coverage without the fold that can blow away at the first disturbance, Admittedly smaller, the Journal does not print all the sh— that’s unfit to print. As opposed to the Times, they print hard truth. No fairy tale kingdoms with falsely imprisoned criminals, government workers who work magic, and stable hands who see truth, the WSJ brings stories those liberal rags will not touch. It also folds into a tricornered hat to show your patrioism.NYT or WSJ. 11% historical average or Land of ID T-Bill 3/4%You may not believe The Street. Do you believe ID?Some VERY good buys today in the WSJ
bookfreak over 13 years ago
I, too, immediately recognized this as a classic cartoon from The New Yorker. Very disappointed by such blatant plagiarism.
ImaginaryFriend over 13 years ago
So, does the comics page go on the top or bottom? Maybe it gets used for one of the other great uses for printed media.
dfowensby over 13 years ago
and in the winter, if you want better protection, raid a dumster and get a couple of those 30-gallon Hefty trash bags for a rain/wind proof suit. nobody uses newspapers anymore when you can boost a blanket or coat from a goodwill drop box.
GROG Premium Member over 13 years ago
That’s about all the papers are good for these days.
jpsomebody over 13 years ago
I get all the news I need from the weather report.
ghretighoti over 13 years ago
The GOP and the Tea Partyers have really got their way with spending cuts supposedly to reduce the deficit. In reality their program amounts to a very effective Jobs Elimination Program: Nobody is spending on anything so nobody is buying anything so nobody can afford to employ anybody and the economy goes down the tube not just here but around the globe. (Strange that there was a big deficit at the beginning of the Clinton Administration and no deficit at the end—and not a lot of painful s**t during the Clinton years…got to be a lesson in there somewhere) And now liberals from the President on down are being blamed for what the Tea Party has foisted on the country. Anybody see the logic in this?