The Buckets by Greg Cravens for March 06, 2012

  1. E
    LLABDDO  over 12 years ago

    Sadly gramps is right.Now go and put the sheet back on your bed before your mom catches you.

     •  Reply
  2. Felipe
    Strod  over 12 years ago

    And let’s not forget that due to the oddities of the Electoral College, in particular (but not limited to) the “winner takes all” policy followed by almost all the states, the popular vote may have little resemblance to the actual results. .In fact, a candidate can theoretically get almost 75% of the popular vote and still lose the election. Or in a race with three candidates one of them can get almost 50% of the popular votes and and the others 25% each… and still the guy with most votes may get no electoral votes at all!.Fortunately those are theoretical scenarios that are extremely unlikely in reality. But the mere fact that such undemocratic results are even possible shows how poorly designed the electoral system of the USA is.

     •  Reply
  3. Festerface
    gary4160  over 12 years ago

    i too remember the mighty Carnac i love it when johnny carson did that bit!

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    yossarianman  over 12 years ago

    I guess no one told him about the 2000 election…

     •  Reply
  5. Tarot
    Nighthawks Premium Member over 12 years ago

    may a diseased Yak make whoopie with your sister

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Greg Johnston  over 12 years ago

    Hitler being elected to a minority government in a multiparty parliamentary system is a red herring; the Nazis still seized control after the election, using the Reichstag fire as an excuse to push for “emergency powers”.Democracy certainly isn’t perfect – but it is the best way of protecting and promoting personal freedom and liberty. Which is not to discount that the US electoral college system is a holdover from the less than fully democratic intents of the founding fathers.

     •  Reply
  7. Flash
    pschearer Premium Member over 12 years ago

    Darcey: If I understand your vague use of pronouns, do you really think people today understand democracy? They typically have at least three different definitions which they freely intermix and confuse: 1) Majority rule; 2) Elections; 3) a free country. But without stringent limits on majority rule, they can vote to violate your rights. Elections? Every dictatorship can put on an election. And nothing about democracy guarantees freedom.

    Now, none of this should be taken to mean that I am opposed to having elections. Elections under a constitutional republic are a vital part of assuring the consent of the governed, without which no government can endure. And it’s a good thing to have a chance periodically to throw the bums out and bring in a new set of bums. But the only thing that matters is a government that protects rights; all else is a minor detail.

     •  Reply
  8. Anishnawbe
    Allan CB Premium Member over 12 years ago

    I hate politics.

     •  Reply
  9. Avatareddie05
    gregcartoon Premium Member over 12 years ago

    I did a cartoon once where Toby claims his social studies teacher said that a Free Market Economy and a Democracy aren’t the same thing. He goes on to point out that the guy doesn’t LOOK like an atheist. I still think it probably confused a few readers.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Comic Minister Premium Member over 12 years ago

    Some prediction!

     •  Reply
  11. Anishnawbe
    Allan CB Premium Member over 12 years ago

    @Greg Cravens … I got a letter from a Horse Rescue and Discount “Steak” house today … know anything about that? :P

     •  Reply
  12. Siberian tigers 22
    Hunter7  over 12 years ago

    If one party gets the most seats – they win. If their leader doesn’t win in his/her riding – then someone who won has to step down – and off we go with a by-election. It happens. Rarely. Right AllanVS?.Eddie would make a good Carnac. .may your tent be infested with sand fleas that are nesting. Or if you happen to live in (insert name), may it be your SUV.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    ecboston  over 12 years ago

    if there wasn’t any politics, CNN would only be on 2 hours a day. And Fox would have never been at all. Sigh

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From The Buckets