Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for October 18, 2009
Transcript:
Noise: Beep! Blip! Obama: Feel like I'm coming down with a virus... Okay. I have a question for all you geniuses... can anyone think of anything better to spend $180 million on today than Afghanistan? No? How about tomorrow? Another $180 million? Why not? And the day after that? Sure! Let's just do it forever! What better way to spend $65 billion a year than failing to prop up a totally dysfunctional narcostate? Can you think of something? Not me! I... fzzt! beep! beep! Voice: Uh... what's wrong with the hope machine? Voice: Legacy issues. Don't worry, he'll re-boot... Obama: Bing! Yes, we can! We can win this!
billydub about 15 years ago
Trudeau is getting a little snide for a Good Liberal…
keenanthelibrarian about 15 years ago
Yes we can … oh, I’m sure it’s possible.
Allison Nunn Premium Member about 15 years ago
Looks like the blackberry icon is going to win!
babka Premium Member about 15 years ago
The Hope Machine is Obama. How do you reboot the complex military industrial Insanity and praise the rich former CIA head (father of a war criminal) helping him shill thousand points of light voluntarism as the Little Engine That Could gizmo enlivening the Oprah sound-bite break keeps short-circuiting the real solution?
“You wish to speak to a human being?”
Ushindi about 15 years ago
Obama isn’t perfect - unless you compare him to what came before him, of course.
WaitingMan about 15 years ago
I’m a hard-core liberal who didn’t vote for Obama because he was too conservative. It’s good to see other liberals catching up with what I realized a year ago.
Fred_Basset_fan about 15 years ago
Garry is a fake liberal. Remember a couple of weeks ago, he trashed 9/11 truth and it was never part of the plot and he never incorporated anything funny in it.
SClark55 Premium Member about 15 years ago
I’ve been following Doonesbury for 30 years, and Garry’s a liberal, but he’s also smart enough to see thru this charlatan in the Oval Office. I wouldn’t be too surprised though if he moved a little to the right someday. My question is, why do the folks on the left so often speak of the cost in dollars instead of people? I want us to continue and to win in Afghanistan, but I don’t count the cost in dollars. I guess if you can count the cost in dollars, rather than finding the quickest and most direct route to victory - which would save lives - it’s ok to sit around for 2-3 months to decide how to proceed.
Yukoneric about 15 years ago
Anything’s possible. Pay them off as the Italians did.
ray32648 about 15 years ago
Bingo, Joe!
Durak Premium Member about 15 years ago
Gary isnt a liberal or a conservative. He is an American. He doesnt want whats right for the Democrats or the Republicans. He wants what is right for the country. Of course he has to base his judgement on his own opinion. And many consider his opinion to be liberal, so he’s cast that way. Like Dr. Toon said, Gary satirizes anyone and everyone that needs it. That’s the purpose of good journalism, to comment on things in a non-biased way.
jimpow about 15 years ago
Afganistan: Population about 28 million (about 2.5 times LA County) Anual GDP about $22 billion Annual GDP per capita about $800
Give every man, woman, and child two years’ GDP (about $2,000 each) equals about $50 billion and get the hell out. It would be a lot cheaper and our troops wouldn’t be in danger.
Frankly, the Afgans aren’t worth the sweat off my “brow.”
tcambeul about 15 years ago
weinberg, does such an animal exist?
Alabama Al about 15 years ago
Garry Trudeau has often been accused by our more rightist citizens as being “biased”. Like a comic strip is suppose to be a news report? Trudeau at least can satirize left-of-center politicians when he feels the jussification arises, and is therefore more “balanced” than any “conservative” strip I’ve ever seen.
In contrast, can anyone – anyone – point to a “Mallard Fillmore” offering in which any “conservative” politician is satirized? (With the possible exception of “Mallard” criticizing them for not being conservative enough.)
bashar327 about 15 years ago
Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran…. the problem with any of those countries, is one of societal values shaped over generations. Getting them to even start thinking or valuing what we feel is important would take…. at the least… a generation to begin, unless you wanted to take a shortcut and were willing to wipe out anyone over 7 or 8 years old and raise the children left behind with what you value. That’s not a opinion on what should or should not be done, right or wrong, but what I see as an…. well…. inconvenient truth.
Durak Premium Member about 15 years ago
Bruce Tinsley has only one talent, liberal bashing. Usually he uses the old. “the think differently than I do so they are stupid” tactic. cfortunato and Alabama Al are both right, Mallard Fillmore is nowhere near as fair as Doonesbury.
JayKay22 about 15 years ago
CHAINS WE CAN BELIEVE IN! SHAME WE CAN BELIEVE IN (or Belief We Can be Ashamed Of?)