Part of this story doesn’t make sense to me. Wilmer will use a term two days from now (originally 1/30/07) that indicates that the land will be seized no matter what. Yet, later on when the ownership is proven otherwise, Eminent Domain is no longer a factor. My only guess is that it was figured that the readers would forget that E.D. was ever mentioned.
Part of this story doesn’t make sense to me. Wilmer will use a term two days from now (originally 1/30/07) that indicates that the land will be seized no matter what. Yet, later on when the ownership is proven otherwise, Eminent Domain is no longer a factor. My only guess is that it was figured that the readers would forget that E.D. was ever mentioned.