Although I agree with your responses, I don’t think you’ll find much of an audience here. Most of the “ideas” here are of the regurgitated “4 legs good 2 legs bad” variety. You won’t find the intellectual climate here very sunny when you mess with the sacred cows (and one of them is, of course: religion is bad, bahh).
Every one appears to do such careful research in this comment section, – and they also appear to have wizard powers to read minds to detect intent – amazing.
I was under the impression that the only ones offended by the Red Skins name are holier than though white liberals – actual native Americans don’t really give a crap.
And the proof is . . . . I must be a liberal basher to ask for it. The C02 “model” is not conforming to the “theory”, but don’t worry, the government knows best how to tax you.
I don’t understand when people say “we need a woman president” and then complain about gender or race bias. Why would a black or woman president be better than a white or male president – unless you truly believe that women are better than men, that black people are better than white people? Try reversing it “we really need a white president” – does that sound just as bigoted as “we need a woman president”?
Although I agree with your responses, I don’t think you’ll find much of an audience here. Most of the “ideas” here are of the regurgitated “4 legs good 2 legs bad” variety. You won’t find the intellectual climate here very sunny when you mess with the sacred cows (and one of them is, of course: religion is bad, bahh).