The logic is impressive.
Assumed: babies are never ugly.
Observed: This thing is Ugly.
Conclusion: This is not a baby.
Observation: Body structure is similar to that of humans and monkeys or apes.
Having concluded this is not a human baby, it must be a monkey or ape.
How he chose monkey over ape is undetermined.
(I didn’t say it was flawless. After all, maybe it isn’t really ugly.)
The logic is impressive.
Assumed: babies are never ugly.
Observed: This thing is Ugly.
Conclusion: This is not a baby.
Observation: Body structure is similar to that of humans and monkeys or apes.
Having concluded this is not a human baby, it must be a monkey or ape.
How he chose monkey over ape is undetermined.
(I didn’t say it was flawless. After all, maybe it isn’t really ugly.)