The logic is impressive.
Assumed: babies are never ugly.
Observed: This thing is Ugly.
Conclusion: This is not a baby.
Observation: Body structure is similar to that of humans and monkeys or apes.
Having concluded this is not a human baby, it must be a monkey or ape.
How he chose monkey over ape is undetermined.
(I didn’t say it was flawless. After all, maybe it isn’t really ugly.)
Brewster, you don’t play with her monkey ( you get her to spank your’s! )!
David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace over 6 years ago
The logic is impressive.
Assumed: babies are never ugly.
Observed: This thing is Ugly.
Conclusion: This is not a baby.
Observation: Body structure is similar to that of humans and monkeys or apes.
Having concluded this is not a human baby, it must be a monkey or ape.
How he chose monkey over ape is undetermined.
(I didn’t say it was flawless. After all, maybe it isn’t really ugly.)
St. Pillsbury over 3 years ago
Brewster, you don’t play with her monkey ( you get her to spank your’s! )!