Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for November 02, 2015

And we return to Danae as punching bag.

I prefer Wileybears, myself…

Studies show that you can commission a study to show just about whatever you need.

Sounds like a truly smashing study.

@mr-sherman: Thanks for the clarification. It supports what I thought the article said. We SHALL overcome. . .Have a wonderful day! :)

I have a friend who does this w/ his Bose system. He averages about 15 sec. per song. Infuriating.

Lucy is not patient with Danae; turnaround? Havta be studied.

Studies show that channel surfing prevents Tunnel Carpal Syndrome.

mr_shermanAnd did you see those pictures of massive lakes and roaring rivers of liquid water on the flat surface of the Greenland Ice Cap?.ZorkArgSo you would rather have pandas shooting up cafes?

The same studies show widespread undetected voter fraud.

Shave underarms

Danae better be paying attention to Lucy.

Reminds me of Mad Magazine, when they had a social commentary in the “sentence” produced by the channel clicking. (And back in those days, you were lucky to get 4 or 5 channels.)

Studies show that many people don’t understand the difference between studies and research….

Studies, and anecdotal evidence show the U.S. population has largely become “short attention span theater”, noteably on the right, where seven seconds of headlline, print or electronic media, is all they’re interested in getting to base all their decisions, opinions, and politics upon.

The less factual the data, the more they support it, and call it “genius”.

can’t wait to see how they jump on NASA now that THEY have a study showing that Antarctica is actually gaining a massive amount of ice-—————————————Of course it gained ice.It was winter down there. (You know; summer in America, winter in Antarctica.)And now, it’s heading for summer, and the ice will melt.Yeesh. FYI: it was NASA climatologists who first had the data on global warming. That’s why the Bush-Cheney administration put out an order forbidding them to talk to the press.Go ahead. Look it up.

“Are they in the study?”-According to further comments by the politically motivated, yes. Yes they are.They are in the study with the lead pipe, settling the science once and for all.But studies show that conforming to scientism means that you have above average intelligence.And studies show that the certain economic and social destruction caused by politically motivated Climate Change Policies might someday, possibly, be offset by a potential but probably unlikely, it being too late already, lessening of climate change that causes less evaporation by more thermal energy being applied to sea water, thus increasing sea depth and reducing inland fresh water resources.Studies said!I’m telling Studies if you don’t comply!

The “Studies Show” ploy…right next to “Some say…”

Stop clouding the issue with facts and details!

Hmmm, “question us and we’ll attack you: with facts”. Does seem to conflict with Danae’s philosophy.

You all are doing a masterful job of arguing with the deaf…