The combined charges should be ok. I mean maybe less than the national debt. And for that you get a choice between dreck and bupkis. Listening to a tour of the universe from Alexa would be marginally more interesting and cost less.
The problem with all the services is that they are at the mercy of content providers. So things get “bundled” and this is why you pay for 6 “good” channels and 400 infomercial channels.
That thought has occured to me as well. It’s annoying to have to many streaming services. As it is, we only have Netflix and Prime.. plus local channels. That seems to be enough. Though I do wish I could find a way to watch all the shows I loved as a kid. That’s what these streaming platforms are missing: nostalgia!
Good idea. And they could include dozens of shopping channels, bulletin boards, weather for someplace on the other side of the country (any country) and a bunch of ‘Only available to premium subscribers’.
She has a good point, except for the cable part. Each streaming service wants to be exclusive and pulling their content from other streaming services. Finding a one-size-fits-all service is becoming more and more difficult.
I’d be happy to get cable without the sports. I’ve heard that sports stations are the most expensive. There is such a cable service last time I looked, but it was also limited as to other channels I like to watch.
sevaar777 over 2 years ago
If someone can build an app for that, they will be very successful.
Ubintold over 2 years ago
If you’re willing to pay all their charges.
sandpiper over 2 years ago
The combined charges should be ok. I mean maybe less than the national debt. And for that you get a choice between dreck and bupkis. Listening to a tour of the universe from Alexa would be marginally more interesting and cost less.
dflak over 2 years ago
The problem with all the services is that they are at the mercy of content providers. So things get “bundled” and this is why you pay for 6 “good” channels and 400 infomercial channels.
kayak4ever over 2 years ago
trivago for the smart tv. hmmmm
Doctor Toon over 2 years ago
My problem is that there is one show I want to watch on one streaming service and another on a different one, and so on
Sure I could find more content once I had the services, but its just too much to have so many
ragsarooni over 2 years ago
So.Do.I…….
Camiyami Premium Member over 2 years ago
That thought has occured to me as well. It’s annoying to have to many streaming services. As it is, we only have Netflix and Prime.. plus local channels. That seems to be enough. Though I do wish I could find a way to watch all the shows I loved as a kid. That’s what these streaming platforms are missing: nostalgia!
goboboyd over 2 years ago
Good idea. And they could include dozens of shopping channels, bulletin boards, weather for someplace on the other side of the country (any country) and a bunch of ‘Only available to premium subscribers’.
MuddyUSA Premium Member over 2 years ago
Streaming can drive you up a wall!
mistercatworks over 2 years ago
That means you have reduced your “boredom coefficient” to “expensive”.
oldlady07 Premium Member over 2 years ago
IshkaBibel1 over 2 years ago
My smart tv has all the streaming apps in one place. It is not a major trial
CeceliaWD Premium Member over 2 years ago
Can I like this more than once?
cuzinron47 over 2 years ago
She has a good point, except for the cable part. Each streaming service wants to be exclusive and pulling their content from other streaming services. Finding a one-size-fits-all service is becoming more and more difficult.
Corpse Horn Light Premium Member over 2 years ago
Don’t give them any ideas! The monthly bill would break everyone with an income under six figures! :-D
chromosome Premium Member over 2 years ago
I’d be happy to get cable without the sports. I’ve heard that sports stations are the most expensive. There is such a cable service last time I looked, but it was also limited as to other channels I like to watch.