Prickly City by Scott Stantis for June 03, 2022

  1. Picture
    ibFrank  over 2 years ago

    She right there.

     •  Reply
  2. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Where are your guns?

    You should be armed.

    Heavily.

     •  Reply
  3. Taz by abovetheflames
    danketaz Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Figures Winslow doesn’t recognize it.

     •  Reply
  4. Ubik
    Pharmakeus Ubik  over 2 years ago

    I thought it would be her campaign headquarters. Common sense need not apply.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    theincrediblebulk  over 2 years ago

    I thought the common sense zone was a myth. No one knows where it is, or how to get there? Do you need that special compass from the Pirates of the Carribbean movies to find your hearts desire in order to locate it?

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    leonardonyc  over 2 years ago

    Sense and courtesy are all but common now a days

     •  Reply
  7. Cheshirecat chandra complg 1024
    Silly Season   over 2 years ago

    I think the ‘common sense zone’ is just another aspect of the Dunning – Kruger Effect.

    Those least likely to have ‘common sense’ are the most likely to invoke it.

    It’s just common sense, don’t cha no! ㋡

     •  Reply
  8. 0023
    GentlemanBill  over 2 years ago

    Doesn’t Winslow, being the liberal, need a passport to enter the state of common sense?

     •  Reply
  9. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Ooooooooh puhleeeeeze!

     •  Reply
  10. 1djojn
    RobinHood  over 2 years ago

    Repeat Comic – Repeat Comment

    The common sense zone is difficult to enter, you might even say it’s a Paine.

     •  Reply
  11. Chef
    denny43 Premium Member over 2 years ago

    You’re wrong. Thomas Sowell lives there…

     •  Reply
  12. 1djojn
    RobinHood  over 2 years ago

    Today is National Donut Day

    Check out Prickly City March 31, 2017

     •  Reply
  13. Image001
    dogday Premium Member over 2 years ago

    I was a teenager during the mid ‘60s/early ’70s. We were so preoccupied with “individuality” we couldn’t see straight. Do your own thing; be free; no one can tell you what’s what, etc., etc., ad nauseum. It wasn’t great, especially given the fruits of that time. But this fever to “identify” as SOMEthing is stupefying. To become “US” so we can know who “THEM” is so we can go to the mattresses of words of hate agin ‘em. To seal your mind and your soul, or whatever you call what makes you YOU, in the concrete of an identification is counter to life which is, by one definition, change in the interest of growth. I’m not opposed to personal boundaries of mind and person; am all for the constraints of ethics, courtesy, respect and decency. But the straitjacket of an “identification” constructed by others is anathema to me.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Prickly City