Garfield by Jim Davis for July 26, 2022

But will it be enough for Garfield?

This should come and handy for cats

Garfield nah I they should play lasagna

A cattorny, eh. He gonna file a pawsuit for ya, eh.

Dial #CLAW, that’s all. For the feline dot com.

if it was a dog attorney, maybe an ambulance chaser one would be a good one

I had no idea that cat lawyers existed. Then again, I guess that I should not be so surprised if Snoopy can be a lawyer

Yeah, he’s going to claw it in……..

No point Garfield, a cat can’t win in a Kangaroo Court.

What if Garfield’s cat attorney, lost the cast ? … That would be a very CATastrophic loss.

Alright, now, the attorney’s have gone too far. I mean, mental anguish from a cat/dog interaction is a bit much. How would you prove a cat’s mental anguish, it eats too much grass, likes dry cat food, or has stopped licking its butt?

But Garfield, the law firm of Kitty & Catnip pay in Pizza!

Sounds fishy to me.

What, not lasagna?

Do you mean Garfield can sue for being barked at by that purple dog that appears every so often?

Garfield shouldn’t do that. I have a better idea. Better Call Saul. Only problem is that Saul Goodman may not accept tuna as a payment method though this Mr. Whiskers sounds like he may be an alter ego of Saul. Hmmm.

Meanwhile, Mr. Rover, dog attorney, gets Odie to sue Garfield for constant harassment. And then Jon sues both of them.

This proves we live in a litigious society. When even the Cats and Dogs are suing each other.

Take em to the cleaners so they pay in smoke salmon filets!

Would that be in one lump sum or installments?

I certainly like it a lot better when the ethics of the legal profession forbade advertising. Now, I’m afraid I am in danger of being run over by hordes of ambulance chasers seeking every opportunity to convince people to sue someone.

There’s actually a show called “Brandy and Mr. Whiskers”.

Something seems fishy about this.

not in lasagna?

Garf is in for a fortuna!

This could be worth pursuing. What’s his hourly rate?

That sounds like all the other low-life lawyer ads. The scum of the earth wants a large portion of the money you suffered for.

Tuna from Subway?

Dial ALL 9’s

I have the TV on and am watching “Grit.” The number of ‘law firms’ on TV who are offering to help you get money for being in Camp Lejeune. I think people affected by the water there deserve help but how does one pick the best vulture in the flock to help them.

Not lasagna???

Odie: “In Tuna? Where’s Tuna?!!”

…. but the payout apparently is less than stantial. That’s what substantial means, right?

It’s not. It’s a Cat Court

Mr. Whiskers successfully defended Little Friskies pawlimony suit in court.

But would Mr. whiskers accept payment in tuna?

It sounds like a cartoon. “Mr. Whiskers, Cat Attorney”.

This will make Bill Parcells want to be a cat!

Pay in tuna? Sounds fishy to me.