This is what the GOP wanted the Jan. 6 commission to look like. That’s why they selected people who denied the 2020 election was stolen to be in it (whom were rejected of course). They just wanted to gum-up the works with and delay the process.
Until tRump came to office I really did not care if Repubs or Demos were in power. Now that he has been and now that I have seen what he does and how he lies, and all the deceit and falsehoods given by his fellow pubs in desperation to keep him in office and to deny the existence of the insurrection, I have a preference now. I’m sure you can guess what it is.
This reminds me of the Mad Magazine parody of “Planet of the Apes”. The courtroom scene where Heston demanded to be tried by a jury of his peers. And one of the gorilla guards complains: “Be reasonable. Where are we going to find twelve billionaire actors who speak in a monotone?”
As long as our current Judicial System actively promotes the integration of Church and State it is our duty and responsibility to point out how much that violates the original intent of the Founding Fathers.
Don’t try to pack the Court! Instead Impeach the last three Supreme Court Justices for lying to Congress in regard to their respect for Precedence.
Looks like the Forman of the Jury is not only a peer, but a close relative. The defendant looks happy, as he should be, because he has gotten away with his crime.
Some people consider ignorance a virtue. The more ignorant they are the more virtuous they think they are. It’s dangerous to all of us when they become the majority and at the levers of power. SCOTUS ?
peeps references friends and like minded individuals (also candy that looks like baby chicks). Looked it up. So if tHump gets indicted I guess he is hoping for his jan 6 accolades to make it on the jury. Like watching a really bad western like destry rides again. Anyway, Wiley is brilliant again. just please be careful. Fascists and Authorities when they take power, the first thing to go are the Comedians, Cartoonists and voices of reason. side request. I use to call the toilet the john. Now I tell people I am going to use the tRump. Seems appropriate and I hope everyone starts to use that. Rightful place in history.
The original phrase was “A jury of peers” – as in the English peerage. The idea was to keep the monarch from having arbitrary power over the nobles (“peers”); they would have to b e tried by other peers rather than by royal fiat.
It did not, of course, give their vassals the same right.
My fellow peeps…. (in this context, peeps being followers and lovers of Wiley :)). No matter what everybodys opinion is, no matter who thinks what politician s*cks and wants to slap them silly, I thank GOD I live in a country where we can commiserate like this (….. at least until they repeal the 1st amendment)
C over 2 years ago
Jury nullification
David_the_CAD over 2 years ago
red caps?
Ohh that statement will get some people angry for some strange reason.
Scorpio Premium Member over 2 years ago
And why i don’t like juries to begin with.
sirbadger over 2 years ago
I thought peeps were those things that people put in microwaves and melt.
saobadao over 2 years ago
Gah, scary
braindead Premium Member over 2 years ago
Republicans hate accountability even more than they hate evidence.
in.amongst over 2 years ago
Enter.Name.Here over 2 years ago
This is what the GOP wanted the Jan. 6 commission to look like. That’s why they selected people who denied the 2020 election was stolen to be in it (whom were rejected of course). They just wanted to gum-up the works with and delay the process.
Until tRump came to office I really did not care if Repubs or Demos were in power. Now that he has been and now that I have seen what he does and how he lies, and all the deceit and falsehoods given by his fellow pubs in desperation to keep him in office and to deny the existence of the insurrection, I have a preference now. I’m sure you can guess what it is.
Isenthor1978 over 2 years ago
Sovereign citizen, anyone?
Old Crusty over 2 years ago
Reminds me of the O J Simpson trial. Evidence by darned.
sandpiper over 2 years ago
Took a while to sink in as I am nowhere near up to modern slang
Old Crusty over 2 years ago
Reminds me of the O J Simpson trial. Evidence be darned.
JosephShriver over 2 years ago
The lawyers tend to pick people that will vote the way that specific lawyer wants the outcome. It is more of a , who can convince the jury best
Kurtass Premium Member over 2 years ago
Jury of sheeps.
dot-the-I over 2 years ago
“Heck with possibility of being hung; let’s go out and hang someone else.”
The Old Wolf over 2 years ago
Dang that trial seems awful familiar. “We find the defendant not guilty on the grounds that we don’t care if he is.”
michaeljwolff over 2 years ago
This reminds me of the Mad Magazine parody of “Planet of the Apes”. The courtroom scene where Heston demanded to be tried by a jury of his peers. And one of the gorilla guards complains: “Be reasonable. Where are we going to find twelve billionaire actors who speak in a monotone?”
William Bednar Premium Member over 2 years ago
Few people know that it was Bill Clinton who first mentioned the pharse “Make America Great Again” during one of his Presidential speeches.
Can't Sleep over 2 years ago
Why Trump wasn’t charged in NYC.
COL Crash over 2 years ago
As long as our current Judicial System actively promotes the integration of Church and State it is our duty and responsibility to point out how much that violates the original intent of the Founding Fathers.
Don’t try to pack the Court! Instead Impeach the last three Supreme Court Justices for lying to Congress in regard to their respect for Precedence.
SusieB over 2 years ago
I am assuming the red hats are THOSE red hats
Masterskrain over 2 years ago
The Qpublican Court System.
rossevrymn over 2 years ago
12 angry white, right-wing populists……………………………………please, GoComics, don’t ban me for writing, “white.”
Lenavid over 2 years ago
Evidence? We don’t need no stinkin’ evidence!
bbenoit over 2 years ago
Is that a jury, or the SCOTUS?
ajr58(1) over 2 years ago
Robert Frost — ‘A jury consists of twelve persons chosen to decide who has the better lawyer.’
vaughnrl2003 Premium Member over 2 years ago
Not a bad idea really. Let’s have a court contest. State vs State and Federal vs Federal. Least guilty verdicts wins.
Redd Panda over 2 years ago
PEEPS ? Is it Easter already? Didn’t we just have that?
HOTLOTUS1 over 2 years ago
should have been a chicken on trial and a bunch of chicks in the jury. Then, after the trial, allthe chicks can come to my place and partay
dandye over 2 years ago
So Wiley IS going to mention the January 6 “committee”? :-)
John Leonard Premium Member over 2 years ago
The Senate, writ small.
monya_43 over 2 years ago
Looks like the Forman of the Jury is not only a peer, but a close relative. The defendant looks happy, as he should be, because he has gotten away with his crime.
mindjob over 2 years ago
Its the next sham trial that has me worried
eastern.woods.metal over 2 years ago
Some people consider ignorance a virtue. The more ignorant they are the more virtuous they think they are. It’s dangerous to all of us when they become the majority and at the levers of power. SCOTUS ?
David P. McLaughlin over 2 years ago
Sussman had a jury of peers—all Hillary voters and donors; Did THEY look at evidence?
brucer31245 over 2 years ago
Maybe they all use Farmalls.
cbedda over 2 years ago
peeps references friends and like minded individuals (also candy that looks like baby chicks). Looked it up. So if tHump gets indicted I guess he is hoping for his jan 6 accolades to make it on the jury. Like watching a really bad western like destry rides again. Anyway, Wiley is brilliant again. just please be careful. Fascists and Authorities when they take power, the first thing to go are the Comedians, Cartoonists and voices of reason. side request. I use to call the toilet the john. Now I tell people I am going to use the tRump. Seems appropriate and I hope everyone starts to use that. Rightful place in history.
Cozmik Cowboy over 2 years ago
The original phrase was “A jury of peers” – as in the English peerage. The idea was to keep the monarch from having arbitrary power over the nobles (“peers”); they would have to b e tried by other peers rather than by royal fiat.
It did not, of course, give their vassals the same right.
drkala over 2 years ago
Why Garland is taking his time
Intergalactic Hussy over 2 years ago
Peeps?
emftoots still causing mischief Premium Member over 2 years ago
My fellow peeps…. (in this context, peeps being followers and lovers of Wiley :)). No matter what everybodys opinion is, no matter who thinks what politician s*cks and wants to slap them silly, I thank GOD I live in a country where we can commiserate like this (….. at least until they repeal the 1st amendment)
keenanthelibrarian over 2 years ago
Excuse me, being from the other side of the planet, but could this by any chance be called “Contempt of Court”?
bakana over 2 years ago
It could be worse. They could be trying to find a Jury of Snuffy Smith’s peers.
sufamelico over 2 years ago
Me thinks that “Why is not called ‘The right to a jury of your perps’ “ fits better, but what do I know ? ?
Isenthor1978 over 1 year ago
I noticed that the drop down calendar is off by one day. Anyone else notice? Or have I broken the fourth wall in my reality?