I should go back to TV news so I can get all my news in 30 minutes. I have a problem with local news. If they say “Coming up in the next half hour”, I will never watch them again, because I don’t want to watch more than 30 minutes of local news.
A few years ago I saw a television news item about an automobile accident that closed an intersection in the afternoon rush hour in a fairly small community. The reporter reported, and the anchor goaded him to speculate, but the reporter stuck to the facts. It was so unusual I still remember it.
I get my news from the internet news services. I can pick from the various news services to get information on the same event. I could not do that with a newspaper, and I’d have to switch channels and hope to catch the same story on TV.
Lately I’ve been turning to AI and asking questions like “Give me the exact wording of judge so-and-so ruling on such-and-such a case.” News services usually summarize and if the quote the ruling at all, it’s only parts of it. So the AI goes out to some obscure law library to look it up.
I trust but verify. I rarely take a single news source as gospel.
I used to read the WAPO in the late ’60s to early ’70s when it was more factual and indepth. Now, it would only make a great liner for the bird cage. Even the local newspaper has diminished in quality and size as it slowly creeps to oblivion. Definitely not the future I thought it would be.
Sometimes I have a hard time remembering this strip is thirty years old. I like to think these depressing developments it was already calling out back then are recent developments and will prove to be passing aberrations. Guess not.
We thought it was bad back then, it pales in comparison to today. Americans (using a generalized voice) tend to just look at headlines when they read news online, and rarely sit through the evening news.
BE THIS GUY 10 months ago
I think Calvin grew up to be a social media influencer.
codycab 10 months ago
In the future, Calvin continues to follow via Internet.
JïllDérs(TOMGF) 10 months ago
I think Calvin is only reading the news from the newspaper because of the charts
sirbadger 10 months ago
I should go back to TV news so I can get all my news in 30 minutes. I have a problem with local news. If they say “Coming up in the next half hour”, I will never watch them again, because I don’t want to watch more than 30 minutes of local news.
hariseldon59 10 months ago
Must be USA Today.
cracker65 10 months ago
Social media
Jayalexander 10 months ago
KISS the secret sauce
snsurone76 10 months ago
People have wondered why I’ve sometimes called Bill Watterson “Sam”.
I’m afraid I may have mistaken him for the actor who starred in LAW & ORDER.
Sorry, Bill.
orinoco womble 10 months ago
And just think, in the 80s most “journalists” could spell!
The Reader Premium Member 10 months ago
No chart, I guess this strip is a fluff piece.
Bilan 10 months ago
Calvin should see the news today. Not too much news included in the news these days.
markkahler52 10 months ago
Thirty years on, not a lot’s changed, really
mac04416 10 months ago
Now that Calven is about 38, the new hasn’t changed a bit.
Jeffin Premium Member 10 months ago
Common taters.
Free or Not? Premium Member 10 months ago
Some things never change. The Newspapers remain mere narrative machines….
jagedlo 10 months ago
And that’s just the regular news… today, we have “entertainment news”, “sports news”, etc…
artegal 10 months ago
Just think: that was 30 years ago, and it’s gotten so much worse since then.
sandpiper 10 months ago
Yep, Cal, and all that medical advice. Something to ‘tell your doctor.’ And guarantee you’ll wish you hadn’t.
flagmichael 10 months ago
A few years ago I saw a television news item about an automobile accident that closed an intersection in the afternoon rush hour in a fairly small community. The reporter reported, and the anchor goaded him to speculate, but the reporter stuck to the facts. It was so unusual I still remember it.
posse1 Premium Member 10 months ago
I may be overthinking it, but shouldn’t it be “it’s got a chart next to the article.”?
Robert4170 10 months ago
Calvin is looking at a newspaper, but the same sarcastic comments can be applied to broadcast news. That’s why I never watch it.
rshive 10 months ago
Probably an in-depth soap opera.
ladykat 10 months ago
Not a bad definition of today’s politics, Calvin.
Vgrift85 10 months ago
Last Panel: That about sums it up.
gregcomn 10 months ago
I just call everybody “Chester”. . . .
dflak 10 months ago
I get my news from the internet news services. I can pick from the various news services to get information on the same event. I could not do that with a newspaper, and I’d have to switch channels and hope to catch the same story on TV.
Lately I’ve been turning to AI and asking questions like “Give me the exact wording of judge so-and-so ruling on such-and-such a case.” News services usually summarize and if the quote the ruling at all, it’s only parts of it. So the AI goes out to some obscure law library to look it up.
I trust but verify. I rarely take a single news source as gospel.
old_geek 10 months ago
A person that engages his brain, analyzes information and considers the news story thoughtfully.
NPR’s worse nightmare…
The Wolf In Your Midst 10 months ago
The problem with the media is that it gives us exactly what we want.
Angry Indeed Premium Member 10 months ago
I used to read the WAPO in the late ’60s to early ’70s when it was more factual and indepth. Now, it would only make a great liner for the bird cage. Even the local newspaper has diminished in quality and size as it slowly creeps to oblivion. Definitely not the future I thought it would be.
sperry532 10 months ago
Considering the Copywrite date is 1994, it’s clear that little has changed in the intervening thirty years.
mindjob 10 months ago
Don’t forget the made up terminology from time to time
kamoolah 10 months ago
Calvin does well for going to a segregated school.
(And yes, there are no children of color in Miss Wormwood’s class).
txmystic 10 months ago
More prescience from C&H…
John Jorgensen 10 months ago
Sometimes I have a hard time remembering this strip is thirty years old. I like to think these depressing developments it was already calling out back then are recent developments and will prove to be passing aberrations. Guess not.
evoroadster Premium Member 10 months ago
A comic from 1994 that is still relevant today, maybe more so.
MartinPerry1 10 months ago
Thirty years old and still relevant.
mistercatworks 10 months ago
Love it. Article beside the chart. Sometimes they don’t even bother to put a legend on the chart.
Izzy Moreno 10 months ago
I wonder what Sam thinks about Twitter.
Mediatech 10 months ago
Why bother with an accurate and in depth explanation, when you can make your point with a vague and deliberately misleading graph.
g04922 10 months ago
Calvin was way ahead of the curve when it came to the MSM…
Otis Rufus Driftwood 10 months ago
And this was all 30 years ago
johnec 10 months ago
Must be USA Decay he’s reading.
baraktorvan 10 months ago
We thought it was bad back then, it pales in comparison to today. Americans (using a generalized voice) tend to just look at headlines when they read news online, and rarely sit through the evening news.
pixiekitten Premium Member 10 months ago
I feel like the media could learn a thing or two by reading a 30 year old Calvin and Hobbes cartoon.