“Today I propose passage of the ‘Hair Powder Act of 1795’. Unless one meets certain qualifications, such as being a member of the British Royal Family or the Clergy, citizens must purchase a certificate to purchase hair powder.
“All of us bigwigs must adjust to changing times. Dare you risk travel about the Continent in such apparent signs of corrupt aristocracy, to risk a date with the guillotine?”
The crowd grew restless as they began to figure out that sitting around watching three old men sign a paper wasn’t nearly as exciting as all the artists made it look.
(syntax supported by the Google, Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckgo, and Brave search engines) in the browser address bar (or search for it using one of those search engines) and choose the first Category: found, and once there find the text string Hickel, and click its link for info and links that point to more info about this huge painting.
Again, a larger strip image is also shown by (Ctrl- or right-) clicking the image in Mr. Melcher’s MASTERPIECE #3376 (September 16, 2024) blog entry, accessible by the Check out the blog! box after the last comment, and using the dropdown menu (even larger, if you trim what’s after .png from the URL). I have added a comment there pointing to info about this artist I used to point to here. So far, only work by him used here.
“I move that we officially change our name from ‘The House of Commons’ to ‘A Space for Everyone Except Inbred, Snooty, Toffee-Nosed, So-Called “Lords”’."
I am totally flummoxed. I pulled up a larger picture of the portrait, and the guy in the lower left hand side of the painting, seems to have both feet on the floor, yet it looked like the bottom of a shoe (or sock) resting on his thigh. Also, is he holding a walking stick or fishing pole? After examining the larger sized photo of the painting, I still couldn’t find Waldo.
rmremail 3 months ago
Parliament before computers.
Or literacy.
Solstice*1947 3 months ago
/// Anton Hickel had painted The House
of Commons, where “common” pols grouse
about matters of state,
and opponents they hate,
and flip-flop about what they espouse.
Say What Now‽ Premium Member 3 months ago
“Gentlemen, welcome to the first meeting of “Girls Are Icky” club."
Bilan 3 months ago
Hopeless romantics waiting for the Taylor Swift / Travis Kelce breakup.
Jayalexander 3 months ago
There’s been complaints that some of you are Bogarting the powder in the men’s room.
phritzg Premium Member 3 months ago
“We will now have a short recess, so those of us who have been drinking too much ale can visit the loo and use the streaming service.”
jdculhane46 3 months ago
Now, let’s get started! Everyone on my left….”row, row, row your boat”
Ignatz Premium Member 3 months ago
The Chekhov 1-act? It’s hysterical.
[Traveler] Premium Member 3 months ago
Men, I’ve called this meeting to ask you, whoever you are, to stop eating the mints in the urinals.
PraiseofFolly 3 months ago
“Today I propose passage of the ‘Hair Powder Act of 1795’. Unless one meets certain qualifications, such as being a member of the British Royal Family or the Clergy, citizens must purchase a certificate to purchase hair powder.
“All of us bigwigs must adjust to changing times. Dare you risk travel about the Continent in such apparent signs of corrupt aristocracy, to risk a date with the guillotine?”
wincoach Premium Member 3 months ago
The crowd grew restless as they began to figure out that sitting around watching three old men sign a paper wasn’t nearly as exciting as all the artists made it look.
Buzzworld 3 months ago
“Will the real George Washington please step forward.”
smokysilver.so 3 months ago
Thank you I watched 15 minutes of it and was repulsed by supposedly typical Californians – (and it probably takes place in Utah).
aerotica69 3 months ago
Milords, please! We need to settle this argument now! Can we please agree to send out for curries today and kebabs tomorrow?
mabrndt Premium Member 3 months ago
The House of Commons, 1793–1794:
Paste (including the quote marks)
"Category:Green tablecloths" Wikimedia
(syntax supported by the Google, Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckgo, and Brave search engines) in the browser address bar (or search for it using one of those search engines) and choose the first Category: found, and once there find the text string Hickel, and click its link for info and links that point to more info about this huge painting.
Again, a larger strip image is also shown by (Ctrl- or right-) clicking the image in Mr. Melcher’s MASTERPIECE #3376 (September 16, 2024) blog entry, accessible by the Check out the blog! box after the last comment, and using the dropdown menu (even larger, if you trim what’s after .png from the URL). I have added a comment there pointing to info about this artist I used to point to here. So far, only work by him used here.
fritzoid Premium Member 3 months ago
“I move that we officially change our name from ‘The House of Commons’ to ‘A Space for Everyone Except Inbred, Snooty, Toffee-Nosed, So-Called “Lords”’."
Csaw Backnforth 3 months ago
I am totally flummoxed. I pulled up a larger picture of the portrait, and the guy in the lower left hand side of the painting, seems to have both feet on the floor, yet it looked like the bottom of a shoe (or sock) resting on his thigh. Also, is he holding a walking stick or fishing pole? After examining the larger sized photo of the painting, I still couldn’t find Waldo.
Holden Awn 3 months ago
“Geez, how long yet before personal deodorant and decent laundry detergent is invented?”
mistercatworks 3 months ago
“If we’re so important, why do we have to sit in the dimmest part of the room?”
berengar 3 months ago
Ok, finally. We want 62 pizzas, half pepperoni, half pineapple, 31 calzones, 15 meat, 16 vegetarian, 104 salads, and 135 Cokes, and 26 Sprites, phew!
Running Buffalo Premium Member 3 months ago
Somebody with dark hair snuck in? Is that allowed?