Close to Home by John McPherson for October 04, 2024

  1. Ava2
    C  about 2 months ago

    Now we’ll have an answer according to MIT

     •  Reply
  2. Mainavatar
    Leroy  about 2 months ago

    ChatGPT: In the word “woodchuck,” what does “chuck” mean?

    In the word “woodchuck,” “chuck” is thought to come from the Native American word for the animal, which is a groundhog or whistle-pig. The term itself doesn’t have a specific standalone meaning in English, but it’s often associated with the act of throwing or tossing something. However, in the context of “woodchuck,” it refers specifically to the animal rather than conveying a particular action. The phrase “How much wood would a woodchuck chuck…” plays on the name rather than its literal meaning.

    That thing is pretty amazing sometimes!

     •  Reply
  3. Leprechaun
    oldpine52  about 2 months ago

    The important thing isn’t how much he could chuck, but rather how much he would chuck.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    AllishaDawn  about 2 months ago

    “A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.”

     •  Reply
  5. Large kimg0147
    Yakety Sax  about 2 months ago

    From Wikipedia: A 1957 Associated Press piece refers to the question as “a riddle which beats the Sphinx, since it’s still unanswered”. A more concrete answer was published by the Associated Press in 1988, which reported that a New York fish and wildlife technician named Richard Thomas had calculated the volume of dirt in a typical 25–30-foot (7.6–9.1 m) long woodchuck burrow and had determined that if the woodchuck had moved an equivalent volume of wood, it could move “about 700 pounds (320 kg) on a good day, with the wind at his back”. Another study, which considered “chuck” to be the opposite of upchucking, determined that a woodchuck could ingest 362 cm3 (22 cu in) of wood per day.

     •  Reply
  6. Bigboycrop
    BigBoy  about 2 months ago

    The real question is would a wood chuck, chuck wood. Here’s a report from national news reporter… yup, you guessed it… Chuck Wood

     •  Reply
  7. Don martin 1
    Farside99  about 2 months ago

    Was that with or without “Skinner Box” assists?

     •  Reply
  8. Img 8467
    Dobie  Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Buck chucked wood like a Woodchuck could when Woodchuck Buck chucked wood!

    Buck’s in the lead at 2.3, so thank you MIT!

    (I don’t see Bleeb, but it appears that Dalcon is about to get bonked by some wood that Buck chucked!)

     •  Reply
  9. Fox picture avatar  2
    phritzg Premium Member about 2 months ago

    This could be MIT’s entry in the next Ig Nobel Awards competition.

     •  Reply
  10. Profile pic
    The Orange Mailman  about 2 months ago

    The people at MIT are very smart. They are very smart. I asked them a question and they said it was a very smart question. No one had ever asked that question before. They said it was the smartest question they had ever heard and no one ever asked that question before. They said that it was one of the smartest questions they ever heard.

     •  Reply
  11. 10891440996 b1c25b9691 z
    Kornfield Kounty  about 2 months ago

    How much wood? Together Everyone Achieves More. ‘Chuck’ Norris

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    s_krumpe  about 2 months ago

    Hey, you dang woodchucks, quit chucking my wood! (bonus points if you get it)

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    dbrucepm  about 2 months ago

    to put it on top of the pile would it have to upchuck?

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    jbduncan  about 2 months ago

    It’s only a cartoon folks! But, I have some Wookchucks you can come get for free, please!

     •  Reply
  15. 3083024 0826053922 daveb
    Kaputnik  about 2 months ago

    I’m pretty sure this same joke was in a Far Side years ago, although I’m not going to try to track it down now. Something like a question people were answering on an exam.

    Yes, I know, it’s hard to be original, and people come up with the same jokes independently anyway.

     •  Reply
  16. Eb5c73e2 872d 4d15 81b1 3e335e993e28
    capndan Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Watch out Bleeb! Incoming!

     •  Reply
  17. 250
    ladykat  about 2 months ago

    Is that a face cord or a bush cord?

     •  Reply
  18. Handy andy
    boydjb47  about 2 months ago

    Or…How much ground could a groundhog grind if a groundhog could grind ground?

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    jtburgess Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Whoa. 2 cords is a LOT of wood

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    Supremecourtjester  about 2 months ago
    According to a Wall Street Journal article, New York State wildlife expert Richard Thomas found that a woodchuck could chuck around 35 cubic feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equal to 700 pounds. Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.
     •  Reply
  21. Img 4475
    carlosrivers  about 2 months ago

    Ask Siri and hear what she says…

     •  Reply
  22. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  about 2 months ago

    Aaaacckk!

    And can I ask? If two witches were watching two watches which witch was watching which watch

     •  Reply
  23. Roundel of sweden.svg
    rhpii  about 2 months ago

    My money is on the Chuckster.

     •  Reply
  24. Construction1
    cldisme  about 2 months ago

    I would not be surprise if MIT has already answered this question. A group of students did a study on the effectiveness of tin foil hats. They used three styles, bowl, cone, and Roman helmet-shape.

    I do not remember which one, but one of the styles actually enhanced the radio waves of a certain wave range that is currently in reserve by the US government for future uses. The students’ conclusion was the US government started the tin foil hat theory in a fit if of reverse psychology to encourage their use in order to secretly test the radio waves “held in reserve.”

     •  Reply
  25. Screenshot 20231128 222147 samsung internet
    Frank Burns Eats Worms  about 2 months ago

    2.3 Buck Chuck.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    zenyattafan  about 2 months ago

    A recent Tundra cartoon showed wood being offloaded from a pickup truck and a woodchuck telling his fellows, “I get mine pre-chucked.”

     •  Reply
  27. Stinker
    cuzinron47  about 2 months ago

    Not doubt from a government grant.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    ekke  about 2 months ago

    Chuck THAT!

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    the lost wizard  about 2 months ago

    Wasn’t Chuck Wood a p-orno star? :)

     •  Reply
  30. 136061 pic
    Mike Baldwin creator about 2 months ago

    A whole pile!

     •  Reply
  31. Elopuck
    MRBLUESKY529  about 2 months ago

    Next, they’ll investigate how fuzzy wuz Fuzzy Wuzzy.

     •  Reply
  32. Avatar
    The Tooninator creator about 2 months ago

    How many warts could a wart hog hog if a warthog could hog warts?

     •  Reply
  33. Me simpsons 2
    eb110americana  about 2 months ago

    “Woodchuck was my father. You can just call me Charles Timber.”

     •  Reply
  34. 1968 avatar 1
    pamela welch Premium Member about 2 months ago

    LOLOL

     •  Reply
  35. 9a61ec07410e91ff118cd354baf25d1f sticker
    Laurie Stoker Premium Member about 2 months ago

    You better move, Bleeb! You’re in a dangerous location!!!

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    jvscanlan Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Excess funding in their budget . . . .

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    PaintTheDust  about 2 months ago

    How many smoots can the MIT wood chuck chuck the wood?

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    geese28  about 2 months ago

    How many licks to the center of a tootsie roll pop?

     •  Reply
  39. Huckandfish
    Huckleberry Hiroshima  about 2 months ago

    How much butter could a butterfly butt if a butterfly could butt butts.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Close to Home