Walking around all day trying to give everyone head but no one bites on the offer..(Never thought I’d use a statement like that in context of anything.)
OK, Marge is right! It IS Judith and Holofernes in spite of the expression. http://mydeejay.deejay.it/contenuto/Gaspare-Traversi-%22Giuditta-e-Oloferne%22/387657The one I knew is the Caravaggiohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Caravaggio_Judith_Beheading_Holofernes.jpg is a better representation which I had already seen.
Rewriting what I wrote 9 hours ago (too early, same links, different words — I really miss the Edit button):Enlarged (actually has larger size), also available from here, but under a different title. Both say (this discusses painting as well) it was painted in 1760; he was at most 10 in 1732. So far, only work by this artist to appear in Mr. Melcher’s blog.
@Dogsniff,I’d totally support Mabrndt (tho I wish his name were more memerable). I’ve had to resort to doing my own searches and most are on Wiki. I hate to bother with the extra step to convert to short URL and anything more than that is a “foggrdaboudit”. I hope posting links to Wiki etc won’t already get me blocked.If Steve Melcher did not have his magnifier blocked, it would not be necessary or if he would provide the original title in small print in parenthesis for those of us enjoying a brush up in art history.
Incidentally, vidazzle, if you do go to his profile the art information posts can be seen there. We just can’t see them here. Since you are nice enough to be filling in that might save you some time.
Thanks for the info; I was wondering why he suddenly disappeared. Consider me to have jumped on the bandwagon (or should that be “banned” wagon?). E-mail has been sent; this one is just STUPID!
margueritem almost 13 years ago
Judith and Holofernes?
To recycle or not to recycle, that is the question…
zero almost 13 years ago
Meadow Soprano whacks the mook who hit her father…
chireef almost 13 years ago
i hope no one makes a comment on needing a little head
chireef almost 13 years ago
d’oh… chireef just did
pcolli almost 13 years ago
On form today, aren’t you.
I think she’s saying,“What a lovely present….what am I supposed to do with it?”
Superfrog almost 13 years ago
Maybe she should have called “tails”.
Ottodesu almost 13 years ago
A head of her time.
Simon_Jester almost 13 years ago
Women! Always messin’ with your head…..
V-Beast almost 13 years ago
Vincent van Gogh must’ve really really like that girl.
Simon_Jester almost 13 years ago
“No, no, Lucia. You put the horse’s head in the guy’s bed. not the other way around!”
Plods with ...™ almost 13 years ago
Just throw it over your right shoulder with the other one
Happy, happy, happy!!! Premium Member almost 13 years ago
hope she gets rid of it before it becomes head cheese.
Knightman Premium Member almost 13 years ago
Talk about a HEAD Ache!
finale almost 13 years ago
Walking around all day trying to give everyone head but no one bites on the offer..(Never thought I’d use a statement like that in context of anything.)
APersonOfInterest almost 13 years ago
How to get a head in iconic mythology. Film at eleven.
Happy, happy, happy!!! Premium Member almost 13 years ago
he is about as offensive as me. whats up with that?
R0sc0e almost 13 years ago
Failure at the Barber School
excelrver almost 13 years ago
This dish is going to the head table.
captainedd almost 13 years ago
She wanted her own chariot with a driver, but NOOOO – her mother had to ask for a head on a platter!
vldazzle almost 13 years ago
OK, Marge is right! It IS Judith and Holofernes in spite of the expression. http://mydeejay.deejay.it/contenuto/Gaspare-Traversi-%22Giuditta-e-Oloferne%22/387657The one I knew is the Caravaggiohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Caravaggio_Judith_Beheading_Holofernes.jpg is a better representation which I had already seen.
mabrndt Premium Member almost 13 years ago
Rewriting what I wrote 9 hours ago (too early, same links, different words — I really miss the Edit button):Enlarged (actually has larger size), also available from here, but under a different title. Both say (this discusses painting as well) it was painted in 1760; he was at most 10 in 1732. So far, only work by this artist to appear in Mr. Melcher’s blog.
turgilsa almost 13 years ago
You have no idea how hard it is to get ahead nowadays….
vldazzle almost 13 years ago
@Dogsniff,I’d totally support Mabrndt (tho I wish his name were more memerable). I’ve had to resort to doing my own searches and most are on Wiki. I hate to bother with the extra step to convert to short URL and anything more than that is a “foggrdaboudit”. I hope posting links to Wiki etc won’t already get me blocked.If Steve Melcher did not have his magnifier blocked, it would not be necessary or if he would provide the original title in small print in parenthesis for those of us enjoying a brush up in art history.
Call me Ishmael almost 13 years ago
the situation comes to a head…
underwriter almost 13 years ago
Go to your own profile and in the address remove your number and put in his. There are probably easier ways that he could tell us and I can’t. :-)
underwriter almost 13 years ago
Incidentally, vidazzle, if you do go to his profile the art information posts can be seen there. We just can’t see them here. Since you are nice enough to be filling in that might save you some time.
Dragoncat almost 13 years ago
Well, her mother did want her to get “a head” in time for her birthday…
bluskies almost 13 years ago
Thanks for the info; I was wondering why he suddenly disappeared. Consider me to have jumped on the bandwagon (or should that be “banned” wagon?). E-mail has been sent; this one is just STUPID!
Happy, happy, happy!!! Premium Member almost 13 years ago
i sent in a message to general inquiry. i asked that mabrndt be restored. i also asked for some guidelines on what is forbidden…
unidyne almost 13 years ago
Don’t they go into the compost bin?
heatherjasper about 10 years ago
Ah, yes, a timeless question.