Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for November 10, 2015

  1. Missing large
    Squizzums  about 9 years ago

    Ah, Bill Simmons. What an empire you’ve created.

     •  Reply
  2. Right here
    Sherlock Watson  about 9 years ago

    And if that’s too complicated, he could get a job as a TV “news” anchor.

     •  Reply
  3. Hellcat
    knight1192a  about 9 years ago

    Well, know which networks he decide to work for. And am guessing which one actually hired him.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    juicebruce  about 9 years ago

    Wow………….. Rat in a yellow suit with tie……this is so un-Rat……was Rat hit in the head by something ?

     •  Reply
  5. Ataridragon
    AtariDragon  about 9 years ago

    Rat is behind the times here. These days the interviews are by women who, by sheer coincidence and nothing else, are physically attractive. The men sit in a booth or studio and give us pearls of wisdom like, “In order to win, they’re going to need to score lots of points while preventing their opponents from scoring lots of points.”

     •  Reply
  6. Thinker
    Sisyphos  about 9 years ago

    A post-game interview-sportscaster! Of course. Possibly the lowest of the low on the Idiotic Cliché Scale! Even Rat could handle that job….

     •  Reply
  7. Art1c 2
    dre7861  about 9 years ago

    But Sportscasters are creative – Just think of all those bizarre names they come up with to describe sports plays. “M’Bume there just threw a Alley-Muggle-Mary-Loop-De-Cranberry-Walrus-Sauce-Throw and he scores!”

    Watching sports with the sound on is like trying to join a club with secret handshakes, codes and alien language. And unless you watch every single second of every single sports cast you will never ever understand WTF they’re talking about! I don’t even think they understand WTF they’re talking about either.

    Another reason I turn the sound down when watching sports is I get embarrassed when the sportscasters get their Raging Bromance on for one of the players – every other word is that player’s name, they endlessly follow that players every move while on the sidelines, and even when that player has the worst game of his entire career they can’t help but gush madly about him like love-struck 12 year old girl at a One Direction concert.

     •  Reply
  8. Mypicture 1 2
    mammamoonbeam  about 9 years ago

    OK. I know nothing about sports or sportscasters so I’m sitting this one out.

     •  Reply
  9. 00712 whiteheron
    whiteheron  about 9 years ago

    Or a marketing executive." The more you spend, the more you save!"

     •  Reply
  10. Caddy
    StCleve72  about 9 years ago

    Looks like he ate 110% anyway.

     •  Reply
  11. Picture 001
    rshive  about 9 years ago

    “We have to score more and keep the opponents from doing it.”

     •  Reply
  12. Fb img 1509486198333
    e.groves  about 9 years ago

    I don’t mind what they say, but I wish they wouldn’t talk so much. Phil Simms is the worst. No dead air with that guy.

     •  Reply
  13. Downloadfile
    Guilty Bystander  about 9 years ago

    Have to admit I’ve been a sportscaster and writer for 20+ years, but you guys are right. If I hear the phrase “Are you KIDDING me?” one more time, I’ll scream. And don’t get me started on Bill Simmons and the School of Frat Boy Writers he inspired, where the goal is to write thousands of words filled with one-liners but nothing memorable. On the other hand, a Rick Reilly column could really touch you AND make you laugh within a self-imposed 800-word limit.

     •  Reply
  14. Airhornmissc
    Liverlips McCracken Premium Member about 9 years ago

    TV sportscasters and sports talk shows are the worst. Those who can ask an intelligent question are scarce as hen’s teeth.

     •  Reply
  15. Image
    SRQgoneBananas  about 9 years ago

    Rat – my nemesis. And I just spent 119% of my energy laughing.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    abbybookcase  about 9 years ago

    there’s a lawrence block book where the character finds he likes watching boxing better when it’s on the spanish channel. he still wants the noise, but not to have to listen to the stupid stuff the sportscasters are saying

     •  Reply
  17. Me 2015
    puddlesplatt  about 9 years ago

    Glib and trite…try Facebook!

     •  Reply
  18. Me 2015
    puddlesplatt  about 9 years ago

    Glib and trite…try Facebook!

     •  Reply
  19. Hobo
    MeGoNow Premium Member about 9 years ago

    I thought he meant he was going to take over the strip.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    joegee  about 9 years ago

    I like when they try to keep their audience in a bad game by trying to make it sound exciting;

    “…and the kick is good! That narrows (insert US footbal teams name) lead to 38-3 going into the 4th quarter.”

    “Well Cliff; (insert 2nd team name) hasn’t quit. There are still nearly 15 minutes to go here and, as we know, ANYTHING can happen!!!)

    Yeah. Right. I’ll keep watching just in case a UFO lands at the 50yd line and asks to speak to Goodell about a suspension.

     •  Reply
  21. Foggie
    yimhere  about 9 years ago

    ….just taking one game at a time… nothing else matters…. just one more game….

     •  Reply
  22. Avatar92
    David Rickard Premium Member about 9 years ago

    Where have you gone, Howard Cosell,Our nation turns its lonely eyes to you.

     •  Reply
  23. Img 20230721 103439220 hdr
    kaffekup   about 9 years ago

    I’m surprised that Rat (after the second panel) didn’t say “I’m going into politics.”

     •  Reply
  24. Troll
    Fibbermcgee Premium Member about 9 years ago

    Watch Coach “Pop” with the Spurs. He abides no dumber than dumb questions. The TV guys are scared to talk to him.

     •  Reply
  25. Bobbyavatar
    Saddenedby Premium Member about 9 years ago

    imho – when sports began to try to be socially relevant ‘on air’ and thought that it had to begin bringing in people who really only wanted to hear themselves talk rather than broadcast or talk about sports, it started downhill. you can still find an occasional announcer that really knows their sport, are comfortable with themselves and bring real additional interest to the game and the sport they announce. the rest (90% up) are all stamped out of a ‘cookie cutter ESPN social conscious, pc correct world’ in which the relevancy of the sport that is being played on the field (in the arena, whatever) is in second place to the political, social, supposedly intelligent comments made in the broadcast booth. i too listen with the sound down/off or read about the highlights later. since i am too poor to afford tickets to the actual pro games and don’t wish to sell my soul to see them play in person, it is either that or quit watching. BUT the game itself is usually interesting, it is just the announcing and stupid rhetoric that passes as sports commentary that drives me crazy. – and yep you pushed a button with this strip pastis

     •  Reply
  26. Large airbrush 20240305192116
    Number Three  about 9 years ago

    I’m in the UK so I didn’t understand this one.

    But I have been reading the comments. So he’s called Bill Simmons?

    Sorry, I’m thick. Haha.

    xxx

     •  Reply
  27. Love ya
    Thee Ox  about 9 years ago

    How do I get my fav comics delivered to my inbox?Thanks@!!

     •  Reply
  28. Blunebottle
    blunebottle  about 9 years ago

    Gross.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    Mike Parsons Premium Member about 9 years ago

    So true. And the talking heads get paid to ask obvious questions; I’ve often wondered how much $$ they make.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine