Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for November 08, 2023

So no to Crazy in Love by Beyoncé.

Fortunately, some of us don’t give a rat’s @$$ about “sensitivity.”

Sadly too true’

Think a thought out of line and suddenly labeled a conspiracy theorist that is thinking disinformation…

Can Stephen pastis ACTUALLY “accomplish” the impossible for him?! Can he continue a comic strip storyline for a whole week or more? Are we actually witnessing an old-fashioned bloom county style storyteller again? Whoa…Dan aka…

… but nobody said RAT cannot put the books into a shredder.

Deranged has the same number of syllables as crazy, but it feels harder to say.

The modern term is bat s—t crazy.

Crazy is a band word. Especially for rock bands.

Is he talking about burning the books or the authors?

Rat must be a devotee of Orwell!

i can’t even make out anymore if this comic is “pro woke” (anti conservatism) or “anti woke” (pro conservatism)

Change every word that may ever be considered inconsiderate, that may offend somebody somewhere in some way, censor them out of our history books lest they influence and corrupt our poor young children’s minds. What words may this be? Oh, you know, words like transsexual, fat, gay, black, master bedroom, racism, equity, abortion, he/she/his/her, etc. Basically anything, you know.

No burnings in Salem, but there were hangings.

We passed ‘crazy’ ages ago.

So Rat is now the witchfinder general eh.

Talking animals? That’s witchcraft.

I’m sorry, but when was this glorious time in the past where people could say anything they wanted? ‘Midnight Cowboy’ was rated X because of an off screen encounter. ‘Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner’ allowed the engaged couple a two second peck.

And one of the largest promoters of censorship for “the masses” would be our ‘friends’ in the MEDIA.Funny how they want nothing to do with the guarantees contained within the Bill of Rights, EXCEPT the, ’Freedom of the Press", clause contained within the First Amendment, all the while calling for the end to the INDIDVIDUAL RIGHT to Freedom of Speech.

Burning the books or the authors?

Sadly some like conformity …..BOO HISS

Pastis thinks he’ll move to Canada , which doesn’t even have a 1st Amendment, to escape this.

Only Stephan could find a way to make a joke using the Salem witch trials!

I used to listen to a gaming podcast where the hosts self-censored themselves, carefully choosing words that would not offend any group. Whenever somebody said a potentially offensive word, they would call a time out to discuss the word and what they could substitute for it. Eventually they got around to stop using words like “crazy” and “insane” out of sensitivity to those with mental illness. It was around that time I stopped listening to them because they seemed to spend more time deliberating over their word choices than talking about actual gaming content.

I use “nervous” rather than crazy. (I use unnecessary quotation marks to denote annoying “air quotes”)

Spot on

If you saw some of the stuff that’s in books for minors these days — books for little kids, books that have won awards — you might think they were reviewed by the Marquis de Sade. Parents have tried to read examples to the school board, only to be told they couldn’t read stuff like that out loud in a public meeting. And we’re not talking biology texts here, you know? (sigh) and here come the people quick to defend the kiddie schlock…

Like I said, banned books are always the best types of books.

Sounds like a Condo Association.

I made the comment “That’s it in a nutshell.” and it was rejected!! Huh!!??

As one author said, “Banned from Florida libraries? That means people will have to buy a copy!”

No burning, just censoring. Agree with me or face the consequences!

This is not the society I want to live in.

Real censorship exists far beyond children’s books. John Anthony West’s work on Egypt is not allowed in Denver Public Library, because Wikipedia says unconscious prejudices, “wildly speculative.”

No one has to drive us crazy. From where we are, it’s only a short walk.

And who are “the rest of us”?

Crazy is right. Based on the voting results last night, we are firmly a country that loves to kill our babies. Sad. Just Sad.

There was no burning at the Salem Witch Trials… just a whole lotta people hanging around.

No burning yet, but “Moms for Liberty” will sic the police on you for ThoughtCrime in The White People’s Republic of Florida.

Got to make sure the kids aren’t thinking MAGA thoughts.

Going forward, this is what will prevent new classics from being written.

“Have we all gone crazy?” Not yet, but we appear to be headed in that direction

Possible Alternatives to saying someone is “Crazy”? … “Unrestrained” …

… “Sanely challenged” … “Special” … “Bless his/her Heart”

My wife is a retired educator, and about twice a year she updates me on the latest words I can no longer say.

Wow, shades of Florida!

The short answer is yes. Most of the world has gone crazy.

Yes.

Oh yes. We actually passed crazy a long time ago…..

Once they start burning the books, it won’t be long before they start burning the authors.

Banned by the crazies, no doubt.

How about looney tooney,oofdee McGoofty,and one hundred percent nuts?

You mean Patsy Cline is banned?

Rat, you should move to Florida.

Tom Sawyer’s friend Jim has something to say about this literary travesty.

Just because a word is banned doesn’t mean that the definition of that word doesn’t exist.

It would seem so, Goat, it would seem so.

Yes. Or at least too many of us. And not just in one direction either.

Should have had Stephen and Larry in the last panel: “Even crocs know witches weren’t burned een Salem”

Rat having any job that involves sensitivity can’t end well.

Might be a banned word… but the answer is yes.

Freedum.

Point of order. No one was ever burned in America for being a witch. Hanging was the American penalty; burning was a European thing.

Rat still manages to burn them, only just in a figurative rather than literal way….

sanity impaired

In thought, word and deed, I’d rather be right than politically correct