The main reason science is so stuck these days: anonymous peer review. I say cast it aside! Make peer review open and publicly accessible, then these “reviewers” will have to explain themselves when they reject some new evidence.
Nopes. It means means you must blindly beliefs without questioning the scientists who is has clout or else you gets slienced and ostracised for blasphemy.
Theory: A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
Social media gave every idiot in the world a megaphone. This will remembered as either the Age of Unenlightenment or The Dark Ages 2.0, if anybody survives to do the remembering.
And/or by anything written thousands of years ago in the Bible or Torah which is by definition absolutely correct no matter how ridiculous e.g., the Earth is 6000 years old.
Anything can be disproved by a thoughtless relative who laughs out loud at your revelation. The first laugh invites more and not a little bit of mockery. For those who struggle to come out of safe hiding, this is not easy. They say the spoils go to the bold or something like that but Jesus said “Blessed are the meek for they will inherit the Earth.” So don’t let them see your tears and stay the course.
The widely accepted consensus that the present continents and islands have always existed in their current forms was challenged by a few eccentrics that pointed to evidence the consensus rejected. Only when several whole new fields of scientific investigation proved the mechanism for continental drift did the old consensus collapse.
Zykoic 11 months ago
Long live consensus science!
Manipulate the data, alpha, beta!
Support the agenda until omega!
The dude from FL Premium Member 11 months ago
I get all my scientific facts and up to the minute news on social media
blunebottle 11 months ago
The main reason science is so stuck these days: anonymous peer review. I say cast it aside! Make peer review open and publicly accessible, then these “reviewers” will have to explain themselves when they reject some new evidence.
Make reviewers accountable.
JoeStoppinghem Premium Member 11 months ago
Yes, on the internet everyone is an expert.
Gent 11 months ago
Nopes. It means means you must blindly beliefs without questioning the scientists who is has clout or else you gets slienced and ostracised for blasphemy.
Qiset 11 months ago
The story that get the most government funding.
jagedlo 11 months ago
facebook post, tweet, or any other form of social media…
DavidSharp Premium Member 11 months ago
I knew Facebook was, like, really old, but I didn’t know it already existed in BC.
Izzy Moreno 11 months ago
How is it “substantially evidenced” and “reliably tested”, if it’s only a theory?
Science is not a religion, people. And any serious scientist would tell you that.
dflak 11 months ago
I remember a time when, “It must be true; I saw it on the internet.” was a joke.
Ed The Red Premium Member 11 months ago
And your uncle never scored higher than a C+ in science, and always complained to his friends how stupid a class it was. But now he’s in an expert.
blakerl 11 months ago
Theory: A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
steveconkey2003 11 months ago
Scientific theory is validated by those that pay the scientists to deliver data that supports their chosen narrative…..Climate change comes to mind.
rockyridge1977 11 months ago
….and we are in “sad shape”!!!!!
Charles 11 months ago
Recent years have shown that 90% of “science” can’t be replicated. In other words, the vast majority of “science” is completely unscientific.
dwagner200 11 months ago
Social media gave every idiot in the world a megaphone. This will remembered as either the Age of Unenlightenment or The Dark Ages 2.0, if anybody survives to do the remembering.
Bill D. Kat Premium Member 11 months ago
And/or by anything written thousands of years ago in the Bible or Torah which is by definition absolutely correct no matter how ridiculous e.g., the Earth is 6000 years old.
nancyb creator 11 months ago
Excellent.
T... 11 months ago
Velly intelligently cleber cartoon men, and your art is always tops…
zeexenon 11 months ago
I doubt that Fuhrer Trump agrees. Let’s ask his kid Jr. for clarification.
mistercatworks 11 months ago
It can be contested but not disproven by such means.
tammyspeakslife Premium Member 11 months ago
Anything can be disproved by a thoughtless relative who laughs out loud at your revelation. The first laugh invites more and not a little bit of mockery. For those who struggle to come out of safe hiding, this is not easy. They say the spoils go to the bold or something like that but Jesus said “Blessed are the meek for they will inherit the Earth.” So don’t let them see your tears and stay the course.
DarkHorseSki 11 months ago
Because, ya know, gender biology is just a theory.
GiantShetlandPony 11 months ago
Are you sure it’s not disproving an uncle’s conspiracy hoax posts?
sisterea 11 months ago
You can’t argue with that, apparently people get all their economic data there as well.
eddi-TBH 11 months ago
The Pedestal of TRVTH has long ago crumbled away.
David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace 11 months ago
The power of being an uncle.
(Brains optional)
Billy Yank 11 months ago
The widely accepted consensus that the present continents and islands have always existed in their current forms was challenged by a few eccentrics that pointed to evidence the consensus rejected. Only when several whole new fields of scientific investigation proved the mechanism for continental drift did the old consensus collapse.