Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for January 08, 2009

  1. Warthog
    wndrwrthg  almost 16 years ago

    The rabble has been roused. Storm the Bastille.

     •  Reply
  2. Emerald
    margueritem  almost 16 years ago

    WW, I’m with ya.

     •  Reply
  3. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member almost 16 years ago

    A thousand points of light…

     •  Reply
  4. Woodstock
    HUMPHRIES  almost 16 years ago

    They’ll just join the circus of voters who wanted their interests protected.

     •  Reply
  5. Horsey
    ANandy  almost 16 years ago

    The question we should be asking ourselves is, How many Representatives and Senators will exit the little car in the center ring?

     •  Reply
  6. Funny avatar 1631 www.free avatars.com
    snapper1  almost 16 years ago

    ANandy: That’s pretty funny!!

     •  Reply
  7. Lamb2
    WCLamb  almost 16 years ago

    …and it’s long overdue!

     •  Reply
  8. 817638c046dd01301075001dd8b71c47 1 1
    limarick  almost 16 years ago

    The REAL Million Man March. Just what this country needs.

     •  Reply
  9. Like sisters  anime
    Net1360  almost 16 years ago

    The Bush family is not packing up fast enough, I see.

     •  Reply
  10. Tornado
    revtry  almost 16 years ago

    It’s not the Bush family, it’s the democratic congress that undermined everything Bush tried to do. Please check all your facts and not the media led fictions we are told.

     •  Reply
  11. 5346ae65734b4d0e82350407ef0d8e00 250
    cleokaya  almost 16 years ago

    Oh yes, the poor Bush family! Give me a break. Better yet, Give me a break from the Bush family. Oh yeah, that’s right, we will be getting a break shortly. THANK GOD!!! And no…George doesn’t have a personal claim on God. I can’t believe somebody thinks that Bush had everything he tried to do undermined. I just wish it were true.

     •  Reply
  12. Dim2
    farren  almost 16 years ago

    I’d rather have a New York Times media-led fiction than a Bill O’Reilly media-led fiction any day.

     •  Reply
  13. Avatar
    mcduffy322432  almost 16 years ago

    Umm … if I recall, Bush had a Republican congress his first six years and it’s only been the past two years that the Democrats have been able to rein in his ruinous policies.

     •  Reply
  14. Beau close up
    mivins  almost 16 years ago

    Let me guess, revtry. Fox News?

     •  Reply
  15. Skull
    James7344  almost 16 years ago

    I wasn’t aware that the Democratic Congress was “reining in” Bush excesses. AS far as I can tell, they have given him everything he wanted. And argued on TV that it was necessary.

     •  Reply
  16. Dsc00655
    Garrulous  almost 16 years ago

    revtry

    Riiight… King GWB never had any of his policies enacted.

    Twit

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Kaero  almost 16 years ago

    Party has nothing to do with it…Republican or Democrat, our beloved Congress rarely votes down a payraise. But I suppose they need it if they’re going to take two years off of their Capitol Hill duties to run for even-higher office…long campaigns get awfully expensive.

     •  Reply
  18. Poncho icon03 mac
    Logicman  almost 16 years ago

    revtry (and all those who followed with comments on him) what makes you think there is a difference other than name between Dems and Reps? We have RINOs and DINOs in the popular parlance, but I say we need Public Servants in Name Only or PSINOs – sounds like Psychos if you say it fast, and isn’t that and interesting co-inkidink?

     •  Reply
  19. Tornado
    revtry  almost 16 years ago

    In two years people will look at our country and dream, wish, and pray for a president like Bush, not because he is great, but because what we have will be so ruinous and destructive to America.

     •  Reply
  20. Ceiling cat sq
    danielsangeo  almost 16 years ago

    revtry: “In two years…”

    Clairvoyant, are you? I guess it depends on what you believe to be “ruinous and destructive” to America and what, exactly, you believe “America” to be.

    See, my belief about America is that we are as the founding fathers envisioned. The past 8 years have, indeed, been ruinous and destructive to those ideals.

    However, if you fully believe those ideals envisioned by the founding fathers are ruinous and destructive to America, then perhaps you’re exactly correct.

     •  Reply
  21. Doris day
    k_sera  almost 16 years ago

    Well, Obama did say yesterday that he hoped Congress would work nights and weekends if necessary to get the economic stimulus plan worked out and adopted. So the extra pay is for all those extra hours they’ll be putting in. Really. (Dang, my tongue is stuck to my cheek again…)

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    eardroppings  almost 16 years ago

    danielsangeo So, you’re saying the Dems believe that the founding fathers believed in a socialist state? I think you meant to say the “floundering fathers”

     •  Reply
  23. Danae
    Wiley creator almost 16 years ago

    tweeet

    Time out, children. This is a comics page, not a political rant forum. Kindly keep your comments to:

    1-Cartoons or cartooning. 2-The subject of the cartoon that day. 3-Me.

    Since this cartoon was about Congress, specifically, their automatic pay raise, not Bush or Obama, please keep your comments about the subject, cartoons or, more importantly, ME. It is, after all, all about ME!!!!!

    Now play nice.

     •  Reply
  24. Ceiling cat sq
    danielsangeo  almost 16 years ago

    Since the Democrats are not pushing for a socialist state, I’m not going to answer that question. And I agree with Wiley here.

    Congress enacted an amendment 1989 which says that they get an automatic pay raise (COLA?) unless they specifically reject it, which they did every year until 2000.

    Makes me wonder which party was in the majority in the Congress in 2000…

     •  Reply
  25. Dsc00655
    Garrulous  almost 16 years ago

    Sorry Coach Wiley. (douces torch) I guess we’re all a little edgy lately.

    Great Nooz strip! Sir.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    sdvogel  almost 16 years ago

    Not to defend congress, but they do have to support three households…one in DC, one in their home state, not to mention their girlfriend(s)!

     •  Reply
  27. Knightni
    Benedick  almost 16 years ago

    Though you may be right in a few points there, Wiley, I’m sorry to say you do not own this site and really can’t say what goes on here. No matter what happens. You sort of asked for it when you wrote these kind of strips.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    LeonardWatson  almost 16 years ago

    I agree that Bush made some mistakes while in office, every president this country has ever had has made mistakes while in office. However, anyone of you who actually believes that Obama being in charge of this country is going to make this country a better place are simply victims of the Obama/Media mind control tactics that got him elected in the first place. Unless of course you relish the idea of living in a socialist state and handing over the soverign rule of this country to a one world government run by the UN, all while being systematically stripped of the rights granted and/or protected by the US Constitution. If that is your idea of the future than I suppose I can understand why you seem to give Obama a savior complex. On the other hand, if you enjoy your rights and freedoms and believe that the US should maintain soverign rule and not bow to the demands of the UN then you should be scared to death at the prospect of Obama being in office. The only hope this country has at this point is to hope and pray we can keep Obama from doing any irreparable damage over the next four years until we can send him running from the white house with his tail tucked firmly between his legs.

     •  Reply
  29. Ceiling cat sq
    danielsangeo  almost 16 years ago

    Bravo Leonard!

    You are completely wrong on every point. Not only does Obama NOT want to “hand sovereignty over to the UN”, he also does NOT want a socialist state and, in case you hadn’t noticed, our rights were being stripped away under the current administration. Obama is seeking to RESTORE those rights.

    If you believe otherwise, you might simply be the victim of the Limbaugh/Media mind control tactics that caused you to blither without evidence or facts.

    I’m not sure where you get your claims from, Leonard, but it’s certainly not from reality.

    Unless, of course, you won’t mind posting evidence for your assertions. Y’know, like claims from Obama himself or his administration?

    However, remember, this is about pay raises. At what point do we as Americans assert our constitutional right to tell Congress what to do? Remember, they work for us, we don’t work for them.

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    jimbo90036  almost 16 years ago

    Economics Made Easy!

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    Claymore_5by5  over 13 years ago

    I’m a hard core Conservative, so Mr. Wiley and I don’t agree on much.

    But, this strip has my complete agreement.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur