Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for June 15, 2016

  1. 1682106 inline inline 2 mel brooks master
    Can't Sleep  over 8 years ago

    All we need to do is get the steel and construction companies, and related labor unions to donate a ton of money to Congress-Man, to get his “attention.”

     •  Reply
  2. Quitedragon 8
    QuiteDragon  over 8 years ago

    Don’t want to start that “fixin’ important things” stuff. Might wind up with people employed.

     •  Reply
  3. Rick o shay
    wiatr  over 8 years ago

    It will take people getting killed from bridge collapses, sewer cave-ins, etc. for these public servants to make noises about fixing things. That’s the only time we get things fixed in this state.

     •  Reply
  4. Onion news1186.article
    Randy B Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Another Moment of Silence for this Unforeseeable Tragedy from Congress-Man®!

     •  Reply
  5. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 8 years ago

    Only congress can fund a bridge repair, the president has no power to do that….Only the people in the House can spend money, all the Senate has to do is rubber stamp it….,..Sure, they haven’t tried to keep bridges from falling down and killing whole bunches of our citizens…So what? They can always blameTo republicans, most other people are only useful as statistics and examples to prove what ever sadistic point they are trying to make at any given time…. That wasn’t their business, their intent or desire…Their only desire was to do nothing and blame it on a real solid American, President Obama (Satan, to republicans.), Remember, doing nothing is an active verb. Buy doing nothing, republicans have caused the deaths of thousands of Americans just, so they could blame it on Obama. Thanks republicans Luv Ya!

     •  Reply
  6. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 8 years ago

    This series is delightfully, sly…Thank you Wiley…Great time to have a job like yours, eh?…I know you’ll do us, and you, proud….Rock on Dude….

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Robin Hislop  over 8 years ago

    No love for Congress-man? It’s a sad state of affairs. But as voters we want these things, we like bridges, roads, police and schools. But we demand they maintain these things without making us pay taxes. If the poor bu- elected official points this out, he’s replaced by someone who’ll promise to do more with less.

     •  Reply
  8. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Sorry. We spent the money appropriated for maintaining the nation on our efforts to improve the nation. So we will need more money. And some of the improvements will also need upkeep, but we’re already committing that money to something else, so buckle up, Buttercup. The ride will necessarily get bumpy so it turns your pockets upside down. And stop complaining. You were wild about the idea of spending our infrastructure money on other stuff before.

     •  Reply
  9. Profile
    matthew  over 8 years ago

    Most roadwork is funded through state and local taxes and, therefore, is the purview of state and local governments. Congress, ie the Federal government, is only responsible for the Interstate Highway System.

    In other words, you’re harping on the wrong level of government on this one.

     •  Reply
  10. Caddy
    StCleve72  over 8 years ago

    “the Senate of the U.S. no longer has any resemblance to that August assembly which provoked the admiration of the Tocquevilles (Alexis de Tocqueville, author of “Democracy in America,” 1835). It would be no use looking for the foremost men of the nation there; neither statesmen nor orators are to be found in it. The body is filled with men of mediocre or no political intelligence, some of whom, extremely wealthy, multi-millionaires, look on the Senatorial dignity as a title for ennobling their well or ill-gotten riches and with crack wirepullers and party bosses who find the Senate a convenient base of operations for their intrigues and designs on the public interest.” This paragraph was written in 1902.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Dr_Zinj  over 8 years ago

    If you built it right the first time, you wouldn’t need to “maintain” it so often.

     •  Reply
  12. Mr haney
    NeedaChuckle Premium Member over 8 years ago

    We can’t worry about minor things like bridges when we have to build a wall, buy more weapons and give the poor rich people more tax cuts.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    WaitingMan  over 8 years ago

    Infrastructure is for losers. Real Americans fly private jets.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Flash Gordon  over 8 years ago

    Years ago my younger sister drove across the i35w bridge in Minneapolis a minute or 2 before it collapsed.

     •  Reply
  15. Millionchimps1
    tripwire45  over 8 years ago

    Term limits.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    GLB1  over 8 years ago

    Or, we could put another $900 billion into “shovel ready” jobs that made it to union pension funds.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    dabugger  over 8 years ago

    Might start by impeaching the bum. Like his wanna me counterparts seeking an office; he has not the vaguest idea what the word infrastructure even means.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    Al Nala  over 8 years ago

    Building new stuff is “sexy”; maintaining old stuff gets no brownie points at all.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    CurmudgeonK  over 8 years ago

    As one who first turns to the Comics each day, especially to Non Sequitur, I find Congress-Man to be an outstanding editorial in the most compact, lucid form! Keep up the great work!

     •  Reply
  20. Oldgeezerlittle1
    Numbnumb  over 8 years ago

    You gotta quit making Congress look sooo Good!!!!

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    hippogriff  over 8 years ago

    Gorbag42Page count is irrelevant. Laws are double-spaced with such wide margins all around that the space devoted to actual law is little larger than that of a pocket paperback..wiatrIt will take more than that. There is a long history fatal accidents involving bridge collapse, pipeline breaks, and similar infrastructure failure, and yet nothing is done about it. We must rediscover our humanity, that our fellow humans are more important than accumulating money, before anything will ever be done.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    millwheel  over 8 years ago

    Never vote for an incumbent. They don’t deserve the job security.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    edward thomas Premium Member over 8 years ago

    And term limits don’t help. They just promote even more the “looking for my next job” mindset that most who go into politics have.

     •  Reply
  24. Cathy aack
    lindz.coop Premium Member over 8 years ago

    And that bridge…it’s a little older.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    hippogriff  over 8 years ago

    JamesThe military/industrial rulers have an unlimited supply of puppets to put in office; the People have only the occasional few. I would put up with the occasional Gormert in exchange for Sam Rayburn, Wright Patman, Henry B. Gonzalez safeguarding and educating those in my state. Term limits won’t bring back those giants of the past, but they would eliminate the Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Al Franken of the present.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    edward thomas Premium Member over 8 years ago

    If you want to rid the government of the M/I complex, WHY are you wanting to get rid of Warren, Bernie, etc.?Start with Mitch, Ryan, Issa, etc., who never met a Defense spending bill they didn’t like.Until it comes to the VA, then it’s a problem. They won’t “honor” our veterans to give the VA the money it needs, then they bitch about why they can’t “fix” things!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur