The other thing I need is something that condenses a 10,000 word article down to 100 words. Sometimes there is a really important issue I should read up on and I feel guilty about not reading the whole article, but I don’t have time.
Apparently he didn’t come across anything that described what the Internet is. It’s a lot more than just the Web which people access with their browsers.
As long as I can still get my comix fix on line, go ahead and kill the internet. I wonder what’ll happen to all those millennials who cannot function without the internet.
Am I wrong to appreciate the entertainment value in watching people who play stupid games win stupid prizes? I know I’m going to hell, but I’d like to go there laughing.
But, what about the people who might buy it? Wouldn’t they see a reduction in tension and have more time to enjoy what is around them? Newspapers could go back to printing good, solid local, national, and international information in sensible language and without emoji’s and other slop. People might take time to read and absorb instead of scanning then racing to add their shallow opinions to the internet that cares only for their numbers but not their welfare. Could be a good thing for many.
The developers of the internet envisioned it furthering education and science as the flow of facts became unhindered…. The developers of the internet forgot that any idea developed for the common good immediately has people abusing it for their own ends.
At first I liked the internet, because I could find out whether a study might be useful without spending a half hour at the library finding the journal, but with social media & selfies I’ve decided it was a far better world before the internet.
I remember when the very first advertisement appeared on the Internet; people were aghast. How could anyone do something like that to us. Doom and Gloom….we were right.
Pretty sure the internet is only a little over 50% idiocy. And the people who like idiocy won’t uze the app, so even that part will still thrive. This will be convenient for a few people and otherwize not change anything.
Yeah the newspaper! I know some folks that claim they do not listen the news on tv or read the paper but they claim know what wrong with this country. They claim they get their info from Fox, their friends or the internet! One is my brother in law, a real dense rock hound.
Just imagine how much more difficult it would be to send pictures of our meals to everyone we know. On the plus side, the occurrence of neck and spine related medical issues would plummet.
The app idea is commendable, but the complications would be too much for any filtering. Consequently, what you’re trying to eliminate would be “backed up.”
True enough, got along fine without it for decades. Oh, but wait, does the idiocy filter also filter out [banned word] naughty pictures and such? The internet would stay afloat on [salacious material] alone, especially if you include the “dating” and “hook up” sites and aps.
David_the_CAD over 2 years ago
If you killed the internet, then how would we read our comics?
scote1379 Premium Member over 2 years ago
Sorry Guys , That Jinn has escaped from that Bottle a Long time ago !
sirbadger over 2 years ago
The other thing I need is something that condenses a 10,000 word article down to 100 words. Sometimes there is a really important issue I should read up on and I feel guilty about not reading the whole article, but I don’t have time.
Cactus-Pete over 2 years ago
Apparently he didn’t come across anything that described what the Internet is. It’s a lot more than just the Web which people access with their browsers.
Bilan over 2 years ago
Google already has an option to filter out idiocy: -site:facebook.com
/s
Richard S Russell Premium Member over 2 years ago
Every tool from fire and the wheel to nuclear fission and robots can be used for good or ill. Only a fool would blame the tool.
JosephShriver over 2 years ago
Who’s to decide who’s idiocy to filter out?
boneroller42 over 2 years ago
As long as I can still get my comix fix on line, go ahead and kill the internet. I wonder what’ll happen to all those millennials who cannot function without the internet.
Isenthor1978 over 2 years ago
Am I wrong to appreciate the entertainment value in watching people who play stupid games win stupid prizes? I know I’m going to hell, but I’d like to go there laughing.
Enter.Name.Here over 2 years ago
For those who remember pre-internet, pre-videogame and pre-smart phone life, all we can say is “If only…”
PraiseofFolly over 2 years ago
Too late! The Internet surrounds the Cyber World, and we are but (3 billion?) Little Phishies caught in it.
YouTube link, The Andrews Sisters:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xaJ-Ou5gTdw
Lyrics, “Three Little Fishes”
https://www.justsomelyrics.com/1272033/andrew-sisters-three-little-fishes-lyrics.html
Can't Sleep over 2 years ago
I’ll buy one!
sandpiper over 2 years ago
But, what about the people who might buy it? Wouldn’t they see a reduction in tension and have more time to enjoy what is around them? Newspapers could go back to printing good, solid local, national, and international information in sensible language and without emoji’s and other slop. People might take time to read and absorb instead of scanning then racing to add their shallow opinions to the internet that cares only for their numbers but not their welfare. Could be a good thing for many.
LawrenceS over 2 years ago
The developers of the internet envisioned it furthering education and science as the flow of facts became unhindered…. The developers of the internet forgot that any idea developed for the common good immediately has people abusing it for their own ends.
keenanthelibrarian over 2 years ago
I get the distinct impression that Wiley doesn’t see eye-to-eye with the internet
preacherman Premium Member over 2 years ago
Not all the internet is idiocy. But, who defines idiocy?
bittenbyknittin over 2 years ago
Just avoid social media.
Prey over 2 years ago
Don´t worry Bernie, some silly b****r will write a virus to kill your app.
bleu nez over 2 years ago
not enough trees now…
Lenavid over 2 years ago
Yeah, God forbid people should have the ability to see any points of view that may differ from the narrative. They might start questioning things.
1953Baby over 2 years ago
Fuhgeddabout it. Human stupidity is endless: now, at least, we know how widespread it is!
Redd Panda over 2 years ago
A flaw to the app. Maybe most of the great masses, love the CrAp on the web?
retjeff over 2 years ago
Give it to CNN or the Washington Post
dflak over 2 years ago
Once upon a time, “It must be true; I read it on the internet.” was a JOKE.
Will E. Makeit Premium Member over 2 years ago
it is truly amazing how you can even make Kackala sound intelligent…
bryce.gear over 2 years ago
How about no Go Comics?
brick10 over 2 years ago
See today’s The Buckets.
zwilnik64 over 2 years ago
The internet was pretty cool until people tried to monetize it.
thelordthygod666 over 2 years ago
At first I liked the internet, because I could find out whether a study might be useful without spending a half hour at the library finding the journal, but with social media & selfies I’ve decided it was a far better world before the internet.
xSigoff Premium Member over 2 years ago
I remember when the very first advertisement appeared on the Internet; people were aghast. How could anyone do something like that to us. Doom and Gloom….we were right.
Snoots over 2 years ago
That app would certainly kill 99.99% of the comments here on these foru
Twelve Badgers in a Suit Premium Member over 2 years ago
Pretty sure the internet is only a little over 50% idiocy. And the people who like idiocy won’t uze the app, so even that part will still thrive. This will be convenient for a few people and otherwize not change anything.
rlaker22j over 2 years ago
with the internet integrity has ben lost
mindjob over 2 years ago
Since they stopped carrying any sort of local paper here, I’ve had to stop fishing, since I have no way of wrapping what I catch
Doctor Go over 2 years ago
“…like killing the Internet.”
Except for online comic strips.
schaefer jim over 2 years ago
Yeah the newspaper! I know some folks that claim they do not listen the news on tv or read the paper but they claim know what wrong with this country. They claim they get their info from Fox, their friends or the internet! One is my brother in law, a real dense rock hound.
Bill D. Kat Premium Member over 2 years ago
Just imagine how much more difficult it would be to send pictures of our meals to everyone we know. On the plus side, the occurrence of neck and spine related medical issues would plummet.
gldoutt Premium Member over 2 years ago
I want that filter.
Corpse Horn Light Premium Member over 2 years ago
…I find this rather ironic, considering that more people read this strip online than read it in the newspaper.
willie_mctell over 2 years ago
As long as communication media exist, broadcast idiocy will continue unabated.
Realimaginary1 Premium Member over 2 years ago
The app idea is commendable, but the complications would be too much for any filtering. Consequently, what you’re trying to eliminate would be “backed up.”
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] over 2 years ago
It would cut it down at least by 50%.
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] over 2 years ago
What your brain can do better than any application.
christelisbetty over 2 years ago
If we got rid of all the idiocy, what would the comics (both stand-up and strips) have to make jokes about ?
DaBump Premium Member over 2 years ago
True enough, got along fine without it for decades. Oh, but wait, does the idiocy filter also filter out [banned word] naughty pictures and such? The internet would stay afloat on [salacious material] alone, especially if you include the “dating” and “hook up” sites and aps.
tee929 over 2 years ago
How many “printed” newspapers are there that publish seven days a week? The three I read on line really rely on their e-versions to stay above water….
Dr_Fogg over 2 years ago
First, we have to go back in time.