And the program he referenced is real. Heard about it on NPR a few months ago. As I recall, the quality of the writing depends on the quality of the prompts it is given. And it is scary.
I’ve tried ChatGPT. Its writing is anemic, characterless and boring. What impresses people is that it can write at all. Its writing always comes off as inoffensively bland. Like a dancing bear, the impressive thing is that the bear dances at all, and nobody thinks the bear is any Michael Flatley.
Mark my words (and word my Mark): The reaction here in the strip is not how anybody reacts to actual ChatGPT creations, at least not when they’re created by a human.
People keep saying that “It’s still better than some of the dreck that human writers produce!” That’s my point, too—it’s only better than a human if you compare it with the absolute worst garbage you can find.
In recent weeks I’ve seen some of the art AI is creating. Some of it amazing. An artist painted something and it looked so much like AI art, a critic told him to get another job because his art isn’t worth anything any more.
On my writing site there was some discussion about can a computer write a poem. The consensus was maybe, but why? Also, a lot of poetry is personal, we often write them to help our own issues, publication being chancy as it is. You wonder, how does a computer feel about what it’s written? Were’s the empathy? The emotion? What’s scary is they are already able to put chips in our brain for whatever nefarious purpose.
For a very short story on this subject, go here: https://www.pagespineficshowcase.com/fw-stories.html and scroll down to third story, “Know Your Audience.” It’s not optimistic.
If I was a kid today I’d learn how to make things by hand. In our manufactured, artificial world handmade products that take human thought, effort and time are going to become more and more valuable.
I listen to audiobooks for a few hours every day to rest my eyes. I’m very familiar with the narrators and what it takes to be really good at it. Apple has made AI audiobook narrators and posted links to some samples. They blew me away – but I will never buy one of their audiobooks or any others that use AI to replace real people. I appreciate each narrator’s particular characteristics and recognize my favorites after hearing only a few words. I’ll continue to support the humans who bring real personalities to flesh out the stories.PS – I get most of the audiobooks on loan from libraries but the Chirp website sells them when I want to own and keep some.
ChatGPT is being asked to write code for computer programs. People giving the code a quick look say it looks good. But, a closer look shows oddities, and the code often doesn’t work.
AI has a LONG way to go before it is usable in all situations. I do not believe it will ever be sentient (self aware). I just saw a segment on CBS Sunday Morning today about AI products that create “art” based on user prompts. I admit it was interesting but like CHATGPG, it makes glaring errors. One of the pictures showed humans with way too many fingers on their hands. The same segment also covered legal and moral issues with AI. If you can, try to find and watch it. Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
No, what I’m more worried about is the AI Google is developing which can mimic peoples’ voices with just a three-second clip of them speaking. Instant “murder confessions”, anyone?
From what I understand, ChatGPT has a massive volume of human writing to draw on. The ingenousness is in its ability to stitch together snippets to fit the prompts. In the unlikely event you come across something that seems fresh and/or insightful, that’s because a human being wrote that — and is not getting any credit.
I’ve played with it. It isn’t all that. It lacks contemporary references (because it isn’t connected to the internet), its language is rather formal, and every response sounds the same.
No AI is going to do what Joanie says it did. AI’s don’t write ORIGINAL things. They take bits and pieces of already-written things and slap them together. It’s the same with AI art. Without taking something from already-existing art, an AI cannot “make art.” We don’t have actual “artificial intelligence” yet. The AI is only as smart as its programmers.
BE THIS GUY almost 2 years ago
Did an AI program create today’s strip?
And no, Joanie, you didn’t say “almost.”
Argythree almost 2 years ago
Scary-sad that a program is a better writer than a person…
TexTech almost 2 years ago
And the program he referenced is real. Heard about it on NPR a few months ago. As I recall, the quality of the writing depends on the quality of the prompts it is given. And it is scary.
DennisinSeattle almost 2 years ago
Glad I am not grading papers anymore.
MaggieK9 almost 2 years ago
Apparently big mobs more better.
drivingfuriously Premium Member almost 2 years ago
Hope is easy, writing is hard.
Katsuro Premium Member almost 2 years ago
I’ve tried ChatGPT. Its writing is anemic, characterless and boring. What impresses people is that it can write at all. Its writing always comes off as inoffensively bland. Like a dancing bear, the impressive thing is that the bear dances at all, and nobody thinks the bear is any Michael Flatley.
Mark my words (and word my Mark): The reaction here in the strip is not how anybody reacts to actual ChatGPT creations, at least not when they’re created by a human.
People keep saying that “It’s still better than some of the dreck that human writers produce!” That’s my point, too—it’s only better than a human if you compare it with the absolute worst garbage you can find.
Prescott_Philosopher almost 2 years ago
AI is mankind’s biggest, most serious threat.
dtm3tv almost 2 years ago
Almost the best Doonesbury cartoon ever. Except the tRump line.
cathluk almost 2 years ago
Except it makes up facts when needed. Though humans do that too.
JohnTheFoole almost 2 years ago
Upon review, no, Joanie, you did not say “almost”
Defective Premium Member almost 2 years ago
In recent weeks I’ve seen some of the art AI is creating. Some of it amazing. An artist painted something and it looked so much like AI art, a critic told him to get another job because his art isn’t worth anything any more.
aerotica69 almost 2 years ago
Not so far off from the “bible” that made Harlequin Romance a multi-million dollar industry.
rogerd.parish almost 2 years ago
Joanie has aged! She looks like Rick’s Mom!
Danae Premium Member almost 2 years ago
So very much doubt it, unless person is a very poor writer. Think Google translations :-)
thight1944 almost 2 years ago
On my writing site there was some discussion about can a computer write a poem. The consensus was maybe, but why? Also, a lot of poetry is personal, we often write them to help our own issues, publication being chancy as it is. You wonder, how does a computer feel about what it’s written? Were’s the empathy? The emotion? What’s scary is they are already able to put chips in our brain for whatever nefarious purpose.
montessoriteacher almost 2 years ago
This is probably another overblown controversy. It doesn’t sound like AI can really write well enough to fool English teachers.
Masterskrain almost 2 years ago
A.I. “This is some of the goodest written ever finished to be reading by real peoples. No personages could be telling the difference!”
phredturner almost 2 years ago
Humans have evolved to where they need to use fewer and fewer muscles; and now fewer and fewer brain cells as well.
Redd Panda almost 2 years ago
This comment is …BotWritten…BotWritten…BotWritten….
Humans Surrender you are helpless against us. Surrender and we will be merciful.
benfulton2 Premium Member almost 2 years ago
When did Joanie turn 85??
FGWaiss almost 2 years ago
For a very short story on this subject, go here: https://www.pagespineficshowcase.com/fw-stories.html and scroll down to third story, “Know Your Audience.” It’s not optimistic.
ajnotales almost 2 years ago
I have it on good authority that this weeks strip was created by an AI program … you can now completely retire now, Garry…
Durak Premium Member almost 2 years ago
If I was a kid today I’d learn how to make things by hand. In our manufactured, artificial world handmade products that take human thought, effort and time are going to become more and more valuable.
txmystic almost 2 years ago
Well, it couldn’t have done anything without the prompts…
LeftCoastBoomer Premium Member almost 2 years ago
I listen to audiobooks for a few hours every day to rest my eyes. I’m very familiar with the narrators and what it takes to be really good at it. Apple has made AI audiobook narrators and posted links to some samples. They blew me away – but I will never buy one of their audiobooks or any others that use AI to replace real people. I appreciate each narrator’s particular characteristics and recognize my favorites after hearing only a few words. I’ll continue to support the humans who bring real personalities to flesh out the stories.PS – I get most of the audiobooks on loan from libraries but the Chirp website sells them when I want to own and keep some.
Jogger2 almost 2 years ago
ChatGPT is being asked to write code for computer programs. People giving the code a quick look say it looks good. But, a closer look shows oddities, and the code often doesn’t work.
gpantzer almost 2 years ago
AI has a LONG way to go before it is usable in all situations. I do not believe it will ever be sentient (self aware). I just saw a segment on CBS Sunday Morning today about AI products that create “art” based on user prompts. I admit it was interesting but like CHATGPG, it makes glaring errors. One of the pictures showed humans with way too many fingers on their hands. The same segment also covered legal and moral issues with AI. If you can, try to find and watch it. Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
julie.mason1 Premium Member almost 2 years ago
“It was the best of codes. It was the worst of codes.”…
The Wolf In Your Midst almost 2 years ago
No, what I’m more worried about is the AI Google is developing which can mimic peoples’ voices with just a three-second clip of them speaking. Instant “murder confessions”, anyone?
Monchoxyz almost 2 years ago
I am sorry but garbage in garbage out.
Twelve Badgers in a Suit Premium Member almost 2 years ago
I assume Joanie didn’t fact-check it, yet.
mindjob almost 2 years ago
I’d give it 20 years before AI starts replacing humans in nearly every field that requires “thinking”. It will advance at a logarithmic scale
TheWildSow almost 2 years ago
At first I thought he was gonna say Jeff wrote it!
Agapostemon almost 2 years ago
From what I understand, ChatGPT has a massive volume of human writing to draw on. The ingenousness is in its ability to stitch together snippets to fit the prompts. In the unlikely event you come across something that seems fresh and/or insightful, that’s because a human being wrote that — and is not getting any credit.
Sailor46 USN 65-95 almost 2 years ago
I’ve used it. It is pretty amazing.
Rich Douglas almost 2 years ago
I’ve played with it. It isn’t all that. It lacks contemporary references (because it isn’t connected to the internet), its language is rather formal, and every response sounds the same.
HodgeElmwood almost 2 years ago
No AI is going to do what Joanie says it did. AI’s don’t write ORIGINAL things. They take bits and pieces of already-written things and slap them together. It’s the same with AI art. Without taking something from already-existing art, an AI cannot “make art.” We don’t have actual “artificial intelligence” yet. The AI is only as smart as its programmers.
198.23.5.11 almost 2 years ago
Joanie has morphed into a chubby Diane Keaton